Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T06:56:54.323Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

State-of-the-Art Evaluation of Repository Sealing Materials and Techniques.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

Paul Gnirk
Paul Gnirk*
Affiliation:
RE/SPEC Inc., P. O. Box 725, Rapid City, SD/USA 57709
Get access

Abstract

Under the auspices of the OECD/NEA Stripa Project, a state-of-the-art evaluation of repository sealing materials and techniques has been undertaken with particular application to crystalline rock. The objectives of the evaluation were (1) to review progress to date in the development of repository sealing materials and emplacement techniques; (2) to identify priority materials for sealing narrow aperture fractures in crystalline rock, including issues of technical concern to the long-term effectiveness of such materials; and (3) to provide a framework for advancing an in situ fracture-sealing test program that can be designed and implemented at the Stripa Mine.

The classes of sealing materials that were considered included cementitious materials, natural clay materials, chemical grouts, fracture-filling synthetic minerals, ceramics, and metals. Of these, cementitious materials and natural clay materials were recommended as high-priority materials for further study because they can be designed to meet desired repository performance characteristics, there is considerable history of successful use in similar engineering applications, and there is indirect evidence that they will continue to perform as expected for long periods of time. Techniques for the emplacement of these sealing materials in rock fractures include pressure injection, dynamic (or vibratory) injection, and electrophoresis.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 112: Symposium P – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XI , 1987 , 219
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Pusch, R., Erlstrom, M., and Borgesson, L., Sealing of Rock Fractures - A Survey of Potentially Useful Methods and Substances, SKB Technica1 Report 85–17, Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co., Stockholm, 1985.Google Scholar
2. Taylor, C. L., Anttonen, G. J., O'Rourke, J. E., and Allirot, D., Preliminary Geochemical and Physical Testing of Materials for Plugging for Man-Made Accesses to a Repository in Basalt, RHO-BWI-C-66, Rockwell Hanford Operations, Richland, WA, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. D'Appolonia Consulting Engineers, Repository Sealing: Evaluations of Materials Research Objectives and Requirements, ONWI-108, prepared for Office of Waste Isolation, Battelle Memorial Institute, Columbus, OH, 1980.Google Scholar
4. Gray, M. N., compiler, Stripa Phase III, Report on Sealing Materials and Methods (ms), Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, Pinawa, Manitoba, 1986.Google Scholar
5. Aitcin, P. C., “Presentation on Grout Materials,” AECL - Fuel Waste Technology Branch, Grouting Experiment Team Meeting No. 3 (ms), Atomic Energy of Canada, Limited, Pinawa, Manitoba, October 7, 1986.Google Scholar
6. Roy, D. M., Grutzeck, M. W., and Wakeley, L. D., Salt Repository Seal Materials: A Synopsis of Early Cementitious Materials Development, BMI/ONWI-536, Office of Nuclear Waste Isolation, Battelle Memorial Institute, Columbus, OH, 1985.Google Scholar
7. Roy, D. M., Grutzeck, M. W., and Wakeley, L. D., Selection and Durability of Seal Materials for a Bedded Salt Repository: Preliminary Studies, ONWI-479, Office of Nuclear Waste Isolation, Battelle Memorial Institute, Columbus, OH, 1983.Google Scholar
8. Gulick, C., Borehole Plugging - Materials Development Program, SAND78–0715, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 1978.Google Scholar
9. Ballivy, G., “Presentation of Planning,” AECL - Fuel Waste Technology Branch, Grouting Experiment Team Meeting No. 3 (ms), Atomic Energy of Canada, Limited, Pinawa, Manitoba, October 7, 1986.Google Scholar
10. Pusch, R.,. Highly Compacted Na-Bentonite as Buffer Substance, KBS Teknisk Rapport 74, Kärnbränslesäkerhet, Stockholm, 1978.Google Scholar
11. Meyer, D. and Howard, J. J., eds., Evaluation of Clays and Clay Minerals for Application to Repository Sealing, ONWI-486, Office of Nuclear Waste Isolation, Battelle Memorial Institute, Columbus, OH, 1983.Google Scholar
12. Karol, R. H., “Chemical Grouts and Their Properties,” Grouting in Geotechnical Engineering, Baker, W. H., ed., American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, NY, pp. 359–377, 1982.Google Scholar
13. Smith, M. J., Engineered Barrier Development for a Nuclear Waste Repository in Basalt: An Integration of Current Knowledge, RHO-BWI-ST-7, Rockwell Hanford Operations, Richland, WA, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Lankard, D. R., Consideration of the Suitability of Ceramic Materials as Materials for Sealing Underground Radioactive Waste Repositories (ms), prepared by Lankard Materials Laboratory, Inc., for the Office of Nuclear Waste Isolation, Battelle Memorial Institute, Columbus, OH, 1980.Google Scholar
15. Clayton, L. G., Gallagher, S. A., and Hanson, D. J., Shaft Seal Design Concepts for a Nuclear Waste Repository in Basalt, SD-BWI-TI-174, Basalt Waste Isolation Project, Rockwell Hanford Operations, Richland, WA, 1984.Google Scholar
16. Pusch, R., Rock Sealing Materials and Techniques Used in Sweden (ms), Swedish Geological Co., Lund, 1986.Google Scholar
17. Pirhonen, V., State of Art Study on Sealing Materials and Techniques (ms), Technical Research Centre of Finland, Espoo, 1986.Google Scholar
18. Pusch, R., Small Scale Bentonite Injection Test on Rock, KBS Teknisk Rapport 75, Kärnbränslesäkerhet, Stockholm, 1978.Google Scholar
19. Tokonami, M., Studies on Grouting as an Engineered Barrier (III), PNC-SJ176 83–01(2), in Japanese, Power Reactor and Nuclear Fuel Development Corporation, 1983.Google Scholar