Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:36:06.486Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Sputter Deposition of Metal Multilayers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

R. E. Somekh
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Metallurgy, University of Cambridge, Pembroke Street, Cambridge, CB2 SQZ, UK.
R. J. Highmore
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Metallurgy, University of Cambridge, Pembroke Street, Cambridge, CB2 SQZ, UK.
K. Page
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Metallurgy, University of Cambridge, Pembroke Street, Cambridge, CB2 SQZ, UK.
R. J. Home
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Metallurgy, University of Cambridge, Pembroke Street, Cambridge, CB2 SQZ, UK.
Z. H. Barber
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Metallurgy, University of Cambridge, Pembroke Street, Cambridge, CB2 SQZ, UK.
Get access

Abstract

We describe the strategy that we are using to make precision metal multilayers. Differential scanning calorimetry has been used with the Ni/Zr system to study the abruptness of the interface as a function of the sputtering pressure. For 10nm period multilayers there is a monotonic increase in the width of the interface with increasing sputtering pressure. W/Si multilayers have been studied as a function of both the sputtering pressure and the relative thicknesses of tungsten and silicon. At reasonably low sputtering pressures a well textured (110) tungsten X-ray peak is seen which is compatible with the expected thickness of the tungsten layers.

Finally, we report some preliminary work on sputtering from tungsten and silicon targets which are at different distances from the substrate so that the degrees of bombardment on the growing layers of the film can be independently varied.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Schneider, M., Schuller, I.K. and Rahman, A., in Interfaces, Superlattices and Thin Films, Ed. Dow, J.D. and Schuller, I.K., (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 77, Pittsburgh, PA 1987) pp. 9198.Google Scholar
[2]Schuller, I.K. and Falco, C.M., Surf. Sci. 113, 443 (1982).Google Scholar
[3]Somekh, R.E. and Barber, Z.H., UHV Sputter Deposition With A Research Scale DC Magnetronn submitted to J. Phys. E.Google Scholar
[4]Gurvitch, M., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 2, 1550 (1984).Google Scholar
[5]Highmore, R.J., Evetts, J.E., Greer, A.L. and Somekh, R.E., Appl. Phys. Lett. 50, 556 (1987).Google Scholar
[6]Highmore, R.J., Somekh, R.E., Greer, A.L. and Evetts, J.E., Mat. Sci. and Eng. in press.Google Scholar
[7]Somekh, R.E., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 2, 1285 (1984).Google Scholar
[8]Motohori, T., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 4, 189 (1986).Google Scholar
[9]Hoffman, D.W., in Proc. 7th Int. Conf. on Vacuum Metallurgy (The Iron and Steel Inst. of Japan, Tokyo, 1982) p. 14 5.Google Scholar
[10]Clemens, B.M., Phys. Rev. B 33, 1715 (1986).Google Scholar
[11]Somekh, R.E., Vacuum 34, 987 (1984).Google Scholar
[12]West, J. (private communication).Google Scholar
[13]Spiller, E. and Rosenbluth, A.E., Proc. SPIE 563, 221 (1985).Google Scholar
[14]Ziegler, E., Houdy, P. and Nevot, L., Proc. SPIE 563, 306 (1985).Google Scholar
[15]Evans, B.L. and Kent, B.J., Proc. SPIE 733, 361 (1986).Google Scholar