Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:01:56.421Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Spin Transport and Magneto-Resistance in Organic Semiconductors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Mohammad Yunus ,
P. P. Ruden  and
Darryl L. Smith
Mohammad Yunus
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Minnesota, Electrical and Computer Engineering, 200 Union street SE, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455-0167, United States
P. P. Ruden
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Darryl L. Smith
Affiliation:
[email protected], Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, United States
Get access

Abstract

Calculated results for spin injection, transport, and magneto-resistance (MR) in organic semiconductors sandwiched between two ferromagnetic contacts are presented. The carrier transport is modeled by spin dependent device equations in drift-diffusion approximation. In agreement with earlier results, spin injection from ferromagnetic contacts into organic semiconductors can be greatly enhanced if (spin-selective) tunneling is the limiting process for carrier injection. Modeling the tunnel processes with linear contact resistances yields spin currents and MR that tend to increase with increasing bias. We also explore the possibility of bias dependent contact resistances and show that this effect may limit MR to low bias.

Keywords

spintronicorganicmagnetoresistance (transport)
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1154: Symposium B – Concepts in Molecular and Organic Electronics , 2009 , 1154-B10-10
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Shinar, J. and Shinar, R. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 41, 133001 (2008).Google Scholar
2 Fabian, J. Matos-Abiague, A., Ertler, C. Stano, P. and Zutiæ, I., Acta Phy. Slov., 57, pp. 565–907 (2007), and references therein.Google Scholar
3See for example: Daughton, J. J. Magn. Materials, 192, 334 (1999)Google Scholar
4 Schmidt, G. Ferrand, D. Molenkamp, L. W. Filip, A. T. and van Wees, B. J., Phys. Rev. B 62, R4790 (2000).Google Scholar
5 Rashba, E. I. Phys. Rev. B 62, R16267 (2000).Google Scholar
6 Smith, D. L. and Silver, R. N. Phys. Rev. B 64, 045323 (2001).Google Scholar
7 Ruden, P. P. and Smith, D. L. J. Appl. Phys. 95, 4898 (2004).Google Scholar
8 Yunus, M. Ruden, P. P. and Smith, D. L. J. Appl. Phys 103, 103714 (2008).Google Scholar
9 Jonker, B. T. Proceedings of the IEEE, 91, 727 (2003).Google Scholar
10 Funaoka, S. Imae, I. Noma, N. and Shirota, Y. Synth. Met. 101, 600 (1999), and T., Wangwijit, H., Sato, S., Tantayanon Polym. Adv. Technol. 13, 25 (2002).Google Scholar
11 Fert, A. private communication.Google Scholar
12 Xiong, Z. H. Wu, Di, Vardeny, Z. Valy, and Shi, J. Nature 427, 821(2004).Google Scholar
13 Liu, Y. Watson, S. M. Lee, T. Gorham, J. M. Katz, H. E. Borchers, J. A. Fairbrother, H. D. and Reich, D. H. Phys Rev. B 79, 075312 (2009).Google Scholar
14 Yunus, M. Ruden, P. P. and Smith, D. L, submitted to Synthetic Metals.Google Scholar
15 Valenzuela, S. O. Monsma, D. J. Markus, C. M. Narayanamurti, V. Tinkham, M. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 196601 (2005), and D. L., Smith and P. P., Ruden Phys. Rev. B 78, 125202 (2008).Google Scholar