Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T13:36:12.901Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Spectroscopy and Nonlinear Absorption of α, ω-dithienyi Polyenes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 September 2012

L. V. Natarajan
Affiliation:
Science Applications International Corporation, 101 Woodman Drive, Dayton, OH 45431.
Laura A. Sowards
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Wright State University, Dayton, OH 45433.
C. W. Spangler
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Montana State University, MT 59717.
N. Tang
Affiliation:
Materials Directorate, Wright laboratory, WPAFB, OH 45433.
P. A. Fleitz
Affiliation:
Science Applications International Corporation, 101 Woodman Drive, Dayton, OH 45431.
R. L. Sutherland
Affiliation:
Science Applications International Corporation, 101 Woodman Drive, Dayton, OH 45431.
T. M. Cooper
Affiliation:
Materials Directorate, Wright laboratory, WPAFB, OH 45433.
Get access

Abstract

The photophysics and nonlinear absorption behaviour of a series of α, ω-dithienyl polyenes were studied in chloroform and n-octane solutions. Steady state fluorescence, fluorescence lifetime and quantum yield measurements were made. The fluorescence quantum yields were significantly lower than those of the corresponding ax,o-diphenyl polyenes. Among the dithienyl polyenes, 3,3′-substituted polyenes exhibited stronger fluorescence than those of the 2,2′-substituted. Nonlinear optical absorption experiments showed evidence of two photon absorption.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Allen, M. T. and Whitten, D. G., Chem. Revs., 89, 16911702(1989)Google Scholar
2 Swofford, R. L. and McClain, W. M., J. Chem. Phys. 59, 5740(1973).Google Scholar
3 Bennett, J. A. and Birge, R. R., J. Chem. Phys. 73, 4234(1980).Google Scholar
4 Anderson, R. J. M., Holtom, G. R. and McClain, W. M., J. Chem. Phys. 70, 4310 (1979).Google Scholar
5 Sutherland, R. L., Rea, E., Natarajan, L. V., Pottenger, T., and Fleitz, P. A., J. Chem. Phys, 98, 2593–63(1993).Google Scholar
6 Fleitz, P. A., Sutherland, R. L., Natarajan, L. V., Pottenger, T., and Fernelius, N. C., Opt. Letts, 17, 716–18(1992).Google Scholar
7 Spangler, C. W., Liu, Pei-Kang, Dembek, A. A. and Havelka, K. O., J. Chem. Soc., Perkin.Trans.l, 799802 (1991).Google Scholar
8 Natarajan, L.V., Sutherland, R.L., Schmitt, M.G., Brant, M.C., McClean, D.G., Fleitz, P.A., Bunning, T.J., and Crane, R.L., Proc. SPIE 1853, 99109(1993).Google Scholar
9 Birnbaum, D., Kohler, B. E., and Spangler, C. W., J. Chem. Phys., 94, 1684–90 (1991)Google Scholar