Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:36:28.485Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some Important Mechanisms and Processes in the Near Field of the Swedish Repository for Spent Nuclear Fuel

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 1992

Ivars Neretnieks
Ivars Neretnieks*
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Royal Institute of Technology, S-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden
Get access

Abstract

In repositories for nuclear waste there are many processes that will be instrumental in damaging the canisters and releasing the nuclides. Based on experiences from studies of the performance of repositories and of an actual design, the major mechanisms influencing the integrity and performance of a repository are described and discussed. The paper addresses only conditions in crystalline rock repositories. The low water flow rate in fractures and channels plays a dominant role in limiting the interaction between water and waste. Molecular diffusion in the backfill and rock matrix, as well as in the mobile water, is an important transport process, but actually limits the exchange rate because diffusive transport is slow. Solubility limits of both waste matrix and of individual nuclides are also important. Complicating processes include alpha-radiolysis, which may change the water chemistry in the near-field. The sizes and locations of water flowpaths and damages in the canisters considerably influence the release rates. Uncertainties in data are large. Nevertheless the system is very robust in the sense that practically no reasonably conceivable assumptions or data will lead to large nuclide releases. Several natural analogues have been found to exhibit similarities with a waste repository and help to validate concepts and to increase our confidence that all major issues have been considered.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 294: Symposium V – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XVI , 1992 , 675
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] I., Neretnieks, H., Abelin, L., Birgersson, “Some Recent Observations of Channeling in Fractured Rocks - Its Potential Impact on Radionuclide Migration.” Paper presented at DOE/AECL conference, Sept. 15–17, 1987, San Francisco, USA. Proceedings, 1987.Google Scholar
[2] KBS - 3: “Final Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel,” Swedish Nuclear Fuel Supply Co. Division KBS, May 1983.Google Scholar
[3] I., Neretnieks, “Diffusivities of Some Constituents in Compacted Wet Bentonite Clay and the Impact on Radionuclide Migration in the Buffer,” Nuclear Technology 71, 458–470, 1985.Google Scholar
[4] L., Nilson, L., Romero, L., Moreno, I., Neretnieks, “Fast Model for Calculating Release of Radionuclides from the Near Field.” Paper presented at the MRS meeting in Strasbourg, Nov 4–7, 1991, Proceedings in print.Google Scholar
[5] SKB 91, “Final Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel. Importance of the Bedrock for Safety,” Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co. Stockholm, SKB TR 92–20, May 1992.Google Scholar
[6] I., Neretnieks, “Stationary Transport of Dissolved Species in the Backfill Surrounding a Waste Canister in Fissured Rock - A Simple Analytical Solution,” Nuclear Technology 72, 194–200, 1986.Google Scholar
[7] Romero, L., Neretnieks, I., Moreno, L., “Release of Radionuclides from the Near Field by Various Pathways - The influence by the Sorption Properties of Materials in the Near Field.” Paper presented at the MRS meeting in Strasbourg, Nov 4–7, 1991, Proceedings in print.Google Scholar
[8] H., Chistensen, E., Bjergbakke “Radiolysis of Ground Water from Spent Fuel.” Stusdvik Energiteknik AB, KBS TR 82–18, November 1982.Google Scholar
[9] I., Neretnieks, “The Impact of Alpha-Radiolysis and the Release of Radionuclides from Spent Fuel in a Geologic Repository.” “Scientific basis for Nuclear Waste Management VI,” Boston, Nov 14–17, 1983. Proceedings, 1009–1022, 1983.Google Scholar
[10] Neretnieks, I., Faghihi, M., “Some Mechanisms Which May Reduce Radiolysis,” SKB TR 91–46, August 1991.Google Scholar
[11] L., Romero, I., Neretnieks, “Modelling of the Movement of the Redox Front in a Repository,” KAT 91/26, Dept of Chemical Engineering, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden, 1991.Google Scholar
[12] D.K., Curtis, A., Gancarz, “Radiolysis in Nature: Evidence from the Oklo Natural Reactors.” KBS-TR 83–10, 1983.Google Scholar
[13] J.E., Cross, A., Haworth, I., Neretnieks, S.M., Sharland, C.J., Tweed, “Modelling of Redox Front and Uranium Movement in a Uranium Mine at Pogos de Caldas.” Radiochimica Acta 52/53, 445–451, 1991.Google Scholar
[14] Liu, Jinsong, I., Neretnieks, “Mass Transport Modelling in the Cigar Lake Project.” Final report in preparation. Department of Chemical Engineering, Royal Institute of Tecnology, Stockholm, Sweden, 1992.Google Scholar
[15] T., Erikson, Department of Nuclear Chemistry, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm. “Estimated Rates of Radiolysis at Cigar Lake.” Personal communication, 1992.Google Scholar