Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T03:51:30.234Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Solution Composition Effects on the Dissolution of a CeO2 analogue for UO2 and ThO2 nuclear fuels

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2015

Claire L. Corkhill
Affiliation:
Immobilisation Science Laboratory, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Sheffield, S1 3JD, U.K.
Martin C. Stennett
Affiliation:
Immobilisation Science Laboratory, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Sheffield, S1 3JD, U.K.
Neil C. Hyatt
Affiliation:
Immobilisation Science Laboratory, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Sheffield, S1 3JD, U.K.
Get access

Abstract

This study investigates the dissolution of CeO2, an isostructural analogue for UO2 and ThO2, which was synthesized to closely approximate the microstructure of a spent nuclear fuel matrix. Dissolution of CeO2 particles was performed in simplified solutions representative of saline, near-neutral and alkaline ground waters that may be encountered in geological disposal scenarios, and in acidic medium for comparison. The normalized mass loss of cerium was found to be significantly influenced by the formation of colloidal particles, especially in the near-neutral and alkaline solutions investigated. The normalized dissolution rate, RL(Ce), k (g m-2 d-1), in these two solutions was found to be similar, but significantly lower than in a nitric acid medium. The activation energies based on the normalized release rate of cerium, at 40°C, 70°C and 90°C in each solution, were in the range of 24 ± 3 kJ mol-1 to 27 ± 7 kJ mol-1, indicative of a surface-mediated dissolution mechanism. The mechanism of dissolution was postulated to be similar in each of the solutions investigated, and further work is proposed to investigate the role of carbonate on the CeO2 dissolution mechanism.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Dekoussar, V., Dyck, G. R., Glperin, A., Ganguly, C., Todosow, M. and Yamawaki, M.. IAEA-TECDOC-1450 (2005).Google Scholar
Stennett, M. C., Corkhill, C. L., Marshall, L. A. and Hyatt, N. C.. J. Nucl. Mater. 432, 182 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corkhill, C. L., Myllykylä, E., Bailey, D. J., Thornber, S. M., Qi, J., Maldonado, P., Stennett, M. C., Hamilton, A. and Hyatt, N. C.. Appl. Mater. Interfac. 6, 12279 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altmaier, M., Neck, V., Muller, R. and Fanghanel, Th.. Radiochim. Acta 93, 83 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oversby, V. M.. SKB Tech. Rep. TR-99–22 (1999).Google Scholar
American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA. ASTM C 1285–02 (2008).Google Scholar
Rai, D., Moore, D. A., Oakes, C. S. and Yui, M.. Radiochim. Acta 88, 297 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lasaga, A. C., in Kinetics of Geochemical Processes edited by Lasaga, A. C. and Ribbe, P. H. (Reviews in Mineralogy, Washington DC, 1981) p.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claparede, L., Clavier, N., Dacheux, N., Mesbah, A., Martinez, J., Szenknect, S. and Moisy, P., Inorg. Chem. 50, 11702 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heisbourg, G., Hubert, S., Dacheux, N. and Purans, J.. J. Nucl. Mater. 335, 5 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar