Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T19:23:43.553Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Solubility Limited Source Term for Cement - Conditioned Wastes: A Status Report

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

F. P. Glasser*
Affiliation:
University of Aberdeen, Meston Walk, Aberdeen, AB24 3UE, Scotland
Get access

Abstact

An important function of the cement backfill in a nuclear waste repository is to react with aqueous waste species and reduce their solubility. However, to quantify backfill performance it is first necessary to prove the existence and establish the nature of the chemical solubility controls. This can be done by characterising the solubility-limiting phases, determining their solubility and thermodynamic functions, and assessing their stability and persistence and solubility during backfill degradation. Much of the necessary data must be acquired experimentally. The title paper describes briefly the progresss of experimental work on selected species including nickel, chromium(III,VI), tin(IV) molybdenum(VI), uranium(VI), Ce(III,IV), thorium, actinide simulants (III, IV) and chloride. Data needs are assessed and although much experimental work remains to be done, methodologies have been developed which will expedite progress. The expectation of a more quantitative performance assessment of cement barriers is, therefore, attainable.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] MacPhee, C.E. and Glasser, F.P.. Immobilisation Science of Cement Systems Mater, Res. Bull. XVII, No.3, 6671 (1993).Google Scholar
[2] Glasser, F.P.. Chemistry of Cement-Solidified Waste Forms pp 139 in “Chemistry and Microstructure of Solidified Waste Forms” (Ed., Spence, L.) Lewis, Boca Raton FA, (1992), ISBN 0-87371-748-1.Google Scholar
[3] Glasser, F.P, Kindness, A., Smillie, S., Attenhein-Haesse, C., Bischoff, H., Marx, G., Aggarwal, S., Angus, M., Hibbert, R., Csétenyi, L., Takáics, Z. and Bagosi, S.. Impact of Additives and Waste Stream Constituents on The Immobilisation Potential of Cementitious Materials. EUR 16942 EN. European Commission, Luxembourg, (1996), ISBN 92-827-7859-2.Google Scholar
[4] Schweingruber, M.. Revision I of Users Guide for Extended M1NEQL (EIR Version) - Standard Subroutine/Data Library Package EIR Report AN-45-84-39. W¨renlinger, Germany, (1982).Google Scholar
[5] Angus, M.J. and Glasser, F.P. The Chemical Environment in Cement Matrices Proc. Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management IX. Mater. Res. Soc. 50, 547556, (1986).Google Scholar
[6] Taylor, H.F.W Cement Chemistry Academic Press, London and New York, (1990).Google Scholar
[7] Poellmann, H., Auer, St. and Kuzel, H.-J.. Solid Solution of Ettringites, Part II: Incorporation of B(OH)4- and CrO 4 2- in 3CaO•3CaSO4• Al2O3•32H2O. Cement and Concr, Res. 23, 422430, (1993).Google Scholar
[8] Conner, J.R.. Chemical Fixation and Solidification of Hazardous Wastes Van Nostrand-Reinhold New York, (1990).Google Scholar
[9] Kindness, A., Macias, A. and Glasser, F.P.. Immobilisation of Chromium in Cement Matrices. Waste Management 14, No. 1, 311, (1994).Google Scholar
[10] Jappy, T.G. and Glasser, F.P.. Synthesis and Stability of Silica Substituted Hydrogarnet, Ca 3AI2Si3 QOL2CH)4,. Adv. In Cement Res. 4, [1], 18, (1991).Google Scholar
[11] Bonen, D. and Sarkar, S.L.. The Present State-of-The-Art of Immobilisation of Hazardous Heavy Metals in Cement-Based Materials in “ Advances in Cement and Concrete”, Eds. Grutzeck, M.W. and Sarkar, S.L., (1994).Google Scholar
[12] Bonen, D. and Sarkar, S.L.. The Effects of Simulated Environmental Attack on Immobilisation of Heavy Metals Doped in Cement-Based Materials. Jour. Hazard. Mater. 40, 321335, (1995Google Scholar
[13] Macias, A., Kindness, A. and Glasser, F.P.. Impact of Carbon Dioxide on The Immobilisation Potential of Cemented Wastes: Chromium Cement and Concr. Res., 27 [2] 215225, (1997).Google Scholar
[14] Kindness, A., Lachowski, E.E., Minocha, A.K. and Glasser, F.P.. Immobilisation and Fixation of Molybdenum (VI) by Portland Cement. Waste Management, 14, No.2, 97102, (1994).Google Scholar
[15] Pagoaga, M.K., Appleman, D.E and Stewart, J.M.. Crystal Structures and Crystal Chemistry of The Uranyl Oxide Hydrates Becquerelite, Billetite and Protasite. Amer. Miner. 72, 12301238, (1987).Google Scholar
[16] Moroni, L.P. and Glasser, F.P., Reaction Between Cement Components and U(VI) Oxide. Waste Management, 15, No. 3, 243254, (1995).Google Scholar
[17] JCPDS Data 14-1433 (CaU2O7 5HQ) and Data 26-1003 (CaU2 O7•11H2O). International Centre for Diffraction Dada (ICDD), Swathmore, PA.Google Scholar
[18] Speer, J.A. The Actinide Orthosilicates, pp 113132 in “Reviews in Mineralogy”, Vol.5 “Orthosilicates” (Ed., Ribbe, P.H.) Min. Soc. of America Washington D.C, (1980)Google Scholar
[19] Speer, J. A. “Zircon” pp 67112 in Reviews in Mineralogy, Vol.5 “Orthosilicates” (Ed., Ribbe, P.H.) Min. Soc. Of America Washington D.C (1986).Google Scholar
[20] Joint Committee on Powder Diffraction Standards (JCPDS). Swathmore PA: Cards 28-229 (1976) and 29319 (1977).Google Scholar
[21] Damidot, D., Birnin-Yauri, U.A. and Glasser, F.P.. Thermodynamic Investigation of The CaO-Al2O3–CaCl2-H2O System at 25°C and the Influence of Na2O. I1 Cimento, No. 4, 243254, (1994).Google Scholar
[22] Damidot, D. and Glasser, F.P.. Thermodynamic Investigation of The CaO-A12O3-CaSO4-CaCl2-H2O System at 25°C and the Influence of Na2O, Vol.4, paper 4iv 066 in “Proceedings of the X International Congress on The Chemistry of Cement and Concrete” (Ed., Justness, H.) Congrex AB, Gotenborg (1997).Google Scholar
[23] Birnin-Yauri, U.A and Glasser, F.P.. Friedel's Salt, Ca2Al(OH)6(Cl, OH)•2H2O: Its Solid Solutions and Their Role in Chloride Binding. Cement and Concre. Res. (in Press).Google Scholar