Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:29:17.805Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Solid Polymers Doped with Neodymium. Complex Formation and Morphology in NdCl3 and Nd(DPM)3-Poly(Ethylene Oxide) Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

Conor J. Twomey
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and Laboratory for Laser Energetics, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627
Shaw H. Chen
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and Laboratory for Laser Energetics, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627
Get access

Abstract

The complex formation and morphology of the NdCI3—PEO system are presented together with some preliminary results on the Nd(DPM)3 \Nd—tris—2,2,6,6—tetramethyl —3,5—heptane dionate]—PEO system. Although the NdCl3—PEO complex is found to be highly hygroscopic, it is shown that residual moisture can be removed reversibly, thereby permitting the role of water in affecting the morphology of the solid to be examined. It is concluded that complexation is a competitive process between the ether oxygens on the polymer backbone and water. Under anhydrous conditions the resultant complex is amorphous at a \EO]/\NdCl3] molar ratio approximately less than ca. 8, but above this critical value the PEO in excess of the stoichiometric ratio presents a second partially crystalline phase. The glass transition temperatures were found to increase sigmoidally with increasing salt content. Despite the hygroscopic nature of Nd(DPM)3 the resultant complexes were found to be moisture resistant upon prolonged exposure to the atmosphere.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Yoshihara, T.; Tadokoro, H.; Murahashi, S., J. Chem. Phys. 41, 2902 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Wright, P.V.; Brit. Polym. J. 7, 319 (1975); Fenton, D.E.; Parker, J.M.; Wright, P.V., Polymer 14, 589 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Papke, B.L.; Ratner, M.A.; Shriver, D.F., J. Electrochem. Soc. 129, 1434 and 1694 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Munshi, M.Z.A.; Owens, B.B., Polymer J. 20, 577 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Wright, P.V., J. Macromol. Sci.-Chem. A26. 519 (Sept. 1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Ratner, M.A.; Shriver, D.R., Mat. Res. Soc. Bull, pp. 3951 (Sept. 1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Bruce, P.G.; Krok, F.; Vincent, C.A., Solid State Ionics, 27, 81, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Farrington, G.C.; Yang, H.; Huq, R., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 135, 319 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Okamato, Y., J. Macromol. Sci.-Chem. A24, 455 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Papke, B.L.; Ratner, M.A.; Shriver, D.F., J. Phys. Chem. Solids, 42, 493 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Lee, Hsien-Yu; Cleveland, F.F., Ziomek, J.S.; Jarke, F., Applied Spect. 26, 254 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Mellor, J.W., in A Comprehensive Treatise on Inorganic and Theoretical Chemistry, Vol. V, (Longmans, Green and Co., 1924), p. 643.Google Scholar
13. Moeller, T., in Comprehensive Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 4, edited by Bailar, J.C. Jr., Emeleus, H.J., Nyholm, R. and Trotman-Dickerson, A.F. (Pergamon Press, NY, 1973), p. 85.Google Scholar