Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:29:27.532Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Slight Radiation Damage in Silicon for Si-Based Device Processing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

A. Harnau
Affiliation:
Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Mikroelektronik-Zentrum (A), D-44780 Bochum, Germany
H.-U. Schreiber
Affiliation:
Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Mikroelektronik-Zentrum (A), D-44780 Bochum, Germany
Get access

Abstract

Utilization of radiation damage by means of ion implantation to reduce parasitic capacitances in GaAs integrated circuits has become a well-established technique in the last years. Similar to GaAs, novel high-speed silicon-based devices, e.g. the Si/SiGe heterojunction bipolar transistor, are generally marked by additional short time annealing related to doping activation and a metallization annealing step in the range of 400 °C .

For reproducing the external base region of such devices, Si-p+nn+ diodes were realized and investigated using I-V and C-V measurements. Slight radiation damage was achieved by Ne-implantation. Apart from enhanced leakage currents due to space charge recombination, capacitance reduction for frequencies above 50 kHz was observed even for a n-layer doping concentration as high as 1 to 2x1017 cm-3 including a 12 min 400 °C annealing step. Preliminary tests with 250 keV-Ne-ions within a dose range between 1013 and 1014 cm-2 were carried out with Schottky diodes on moderately doped n-type Si-substrate (0.3 Ωcm). For a high temperature furnace anneal at 900 °C (2 min), no capacitance reduction could be observed.

Compared to previous results with Ar-implantation to obtain amorphized silicon layers, this technique allows a more easy technological handling concerning the metallization and the use of a simple photoresist pattern.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Schreiber, H.-U., Electron. Lett. 28, 485 (1992).Google Scholar
2 Crabbé, E. F., Comfort, J. H. et al. , IEEE El. Dev. Lett. 13, 259 (1992).Google Scholar
3 Sato, F., Hashimoto, T. et al. , IEDM Techn. Dig., 397 (1992).Google Scholar
4 Gruhle, A., Kibbel, H. et al. , IEEE El. Dev. Lett., 13, 206 (1992).Google Scholar
5 Ishibashi, T., Yamauchi, Y. et al. , IEEE El. Dev. Lett. 8, 194 (1987).Google Scholar
6 Asbeck, P. M., Miller, D. L. et al. , IEEE El. Dev. Lett. 5, 310 (1984).Google Scholar
7 Chen, J.-W. and Milnes, A. G., Ann. Rev. Mater. Sci. 10, 157 (1980).Google Scholar
8 Ziegler, J. F., TRIM-91, IBM-Research, New York, 1991.Google Scholar
9 Müller, G. and Kalbitzer, S., Phil. Mag. B 41, 307 (1980).Google Scholar
10 Berger, S., Komem, Y. and Weiß, B. Z., IEEE Trans. El. Dev. 39, 208 (1992).Google Scholar
11 Harnau, A. and Schreiber, H.-U., Europhysics conference abstracts 17 A, 1471 (1993).Google Scholar
12 Viktorovitch, P., J. Appl. Phys. 52, 1392 (1981).Google Scholar
13 Cohen, J. D., in Semiconductors and Semimetals. vol. 21–C, edited by Willardson, R. K., Beer, A. C. and Pankove, J. L. (Academic Press, New York, 1984), pp. 2838.Google Scholar
14 Sze, S. M., in Physics of Semiconductor Devices. 2nd ed. (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1981), p. 91,Google Scholar
15 van der Pauw, L. J., Philips Res. Repts 13, 1 (1958).Google Scholar