Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-8gtf8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-18T06:46:37.352Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Simultaneous Evaporation of CS and TC During Vitrification-A Thermochemical Approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

H. Migge
H. Migge*
Affiliation:
Hahn-Meitner-Institut GmbH, Glienicker-Str. 100,D-1000 Berlin 39, Federal Republic of, Germany
Get access

Extract

In vitrification of nuclear waste, technetium tends to be lost substantially by evaporation [1,2,3,4,5]. If Cs is not present, 63% of the Tc volatilized from the molten borolilicate glass at 1420K under oxidizing conditions and about 40% under reducing conditions achieved by adding 0.5 wt% graphite to the dried frit mixture[5]. This behaviour could be correlated to thermochemistry in the simple Tc-O system considering the predominance areas of the different oxides and the partial pressures of Tc2O7 above them[6]. If Cs is present(0.544 g Cs/l together with 1.61 g Na/l in the synthetic HAW solution), Tc was found to start a genuine volatilization at about 800K which proceeded rapidly in the range 875 to 950K[2]. At 1300K between 60 and 80% of the Tc and 10% of the Cs had volatilized. Because of the ratio Tc:Cs≉7:l volatility by formation of gaseous CsTcO4 was excluded[2]. On the other hand, for the same glass and HAW solution as reported in Ref.[2], Tc was found to produce a synergistic effect on the volatility of Cs[3,4]: between 2 and 5% Cs volatilized without Tc but about 22% in the presence of Tc and temperatures up to 1400K. The amount of volatilized Tc was about 50%. Furthermore[3,4], Tc was identified together with Cs in crystals deposited in the aerosolfilters after continuous heating to about 1170K. Since the aerosol crystals showed a constant ratio of Tc:Cs =1:1 and since the valency of Tc in the crystals was found to be seven the formation and the condensation of gaseous CsTcO4 was assumed [3,4]. Gaseous CsTcO4 or other gaseous pertechnetates of the alkaline metals have not yet been identified experimentally. Its existence may be concluded, however, from the existence of the gaseous perrhenates which form with every alkaline metal. Solid CsTcO4 and other solid alkalipertechnetates are well known [7]. By using the thermochemical data of the alkaliperrhenates, free energies of condensed as well as of gaseous CsTcO4 are estimated. Together with the results of the thermochemical treatment of the Tc-O system[6] and experimental data of the Cs-O system[8] they are used to calculate tentative isothermal predominance area diagrams of the ternary Cs-Tc-O system. Isobars of the gases Cs2O,CsO,Tc2O7, and CsTcO4 above the different condensed phases are also cal culated and used to understand the experimental results[2,3,4] on the simultaneous evaporation of Cs and Tc during vitrification.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 176: Symposium U – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XIII , 1989 , 411
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Jouan, A., Moncouyoux, J.P. and Halaszovich, S., EUR 10650, 1986.Google Scholar
2. Lammertz, H., Merz, E. and Halaszovich, St., Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management VIII MRS Pittsburgh, PA, 1985, p.823.Google Scholar
3. Baumgartner, F. et al, Nukleare Entsorgung, VCH Verlagsgesell-schaft mbH, Weinheim, 1986 Band 3, p. 291–321.Google Scholar
4. Baumgartner, F., Krebs, K. and Merte, B., Kerntechnik 51, 151 (1987).Google Scholar
5. Bibler, N.E., and Jurgensen, A.R., Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XI, MRS, Pittsburgh, PA, 1987,p. 585–593.Google Scholar
6. Migge, H., Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XII, MRS, Pittsburgh, PA, 1988, p. 205–213.Google Scholar
7. Keller, C. and Kanellakopulos, B., Radiochim. Acta 1, 107 (1963).Google Scholar
8. Knights, C.F. and Phillips, B.A., J.Nucl.Mat. 84, 196 (1979).Google Scholar
9. Freude, E. et al, Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XII, MRS, Pittsburgh, PA, 1988, p.199–204.Google Scholar
10. Niessen, A.K. et al, CALPHAD 7, 51 (1983).Google Scholar
11. Pankratz, L.B., BM-672, 1982.Google Scholar
12. Kugler, H. and Keller, C.(editors), Gmelin Handbook of Inorganic Chemistry, 8th ed. Technetium, Suppl. Vol.2, Springer Verl, 1983.Google Scholar
13. Rard, J.A., UCRL-53440, 1983.Google Scholar
14.The NEA Thermochem. Data Base Project (NEA-TDB), OECD Nuclear Energy Agency, Data Bank, F-91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France.Google Scholar
15. Vida, J., Dissertation, TH Karlsruhe 1989.Google Scholar
16. Lukas, W. and Gaune-Escard, M., J.Chem.Thermodynamics, 14, 593 (1982)Google Scholar
17. German, K.E., Kryuchkov, S.W. and Belyaeva, L.I., Izvestia akademii nauk SSSR,ser.chimiceskaja, No.10, 2387 (1987).Google Scholar
18. Lindemer, T.B. et al, J.Nucl.Mat. 100, 178 (1981), p.191 and 180.Google Scholar
19. Kazin, I.V., Kyskin, V.I., Petrova, S.M. and Kaganyuk, D.S., Russian J. Phys.Chem, 58, 19 (1984).Google Scholar
20. Wagman, D.D. et al., The NBS tables in J.Phys.Chem.Ref.Data, 11(1982), Suppl.2.Google Scholar
21. Semenov, G.A. et al, Vestnik Leningradskowo Universiteta, Fizika Khimiya, Ser.4, 44(1988), p.46, 47, 48.Google Scholar
22. Bonnell, D.W. et al, J.Non-Cryst.Sol. 84, 286 (1986).Google Scholar
23. Asano, M. et al, J.Non-Cryst.Sol. 92, 245 (1987).Google Scholar