Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T06:59:01.449Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Simulation of the Texture Evolution of Aluminium Alloys During Primary Static Recrystallization Using a Cellular Automaton Approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

V. Marx
Affiliation:
Institut für Metallkunde und Metallphysik, RWTH Aachen, Kopernikusstr. 14, 52056 Aachen, Germany, [email protected]
G. Gottstein
Affiliation:
Institut für Metallkunde und Metallphysikx, RWTH Aachen, Kopernikusstr. 14, 52056 Aachen, Germany
Get access

Abstract

A 3D model has been developed to simulate both primary static recrystallization and recovery of cold worked aluminium alloys. The model is based on a modified cellular automaton approach and incorporates the influence of crystallographic texture and microstructure in respect to both mechanisms mentioned above. The model takes into account oriented nucleation using an approach developed by Nes for aluminium alloys. The subsequent growth of the nuclei depends on the local stored energy of the deformed matrix (i.e. the driving pressure) and the misorientation between a growing nucleus and its surrounding matrix (i.e. the grain boundary mobility). This approach allows to model preferred growth of grains that exhibit maximum growth rate orientation relationship, e.g. for aluminium alloys a 40° <111> relationship with the surrounding matrix. The model simulates kinetics, microstructure and texture development during heat treatment, discrete in time and space.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Reher, F.R, doctoral thesis, RWTH Aachen.Google Scholar
2 Marx, V., Reher, F.R, Gottstein, G., submitted to Acta mater.Google Scholar
3 Jensen, D. Juul, Hansen, N. and Humphreys, F.J, Acta metall. 33, 2155 (1985).Google Scholar
4 Lücke, K. and Engler, O., Mat. Sci. Tech. 6, 1113 (1990).Google Scholar
5 Hjelen, J., Orsund, R. and Nes, E., Acta metall. mater. 39, 1377 (1991).Google Scholar
6 Vatne, H.E, Furu, T., Orsund, R. and Nes, E., Acta mater. 44, 4463 (1996).Google Scholar
7 Bellier, S.P. and Doherty, R.D, Acta metall 25, 521 (1977).Google Scholar
8 Humphreys, F.J, Acta metall. 25, 1323 (1997).Google Scholar
9 , Fortunier and Hirsch, J., in Theoretical Methods of Texture Analysis, edited by Bunge, H.J. (DGM 1987), p. 231.Google Scholar
10 Engler, O., Kong, X.W. and Yang, P., Scripta mater. in press,Google Scholar
11 Engler, O., habilitation thesis, RWTH Aachen (1995).Google Scholar