Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:50:23.533Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sims Characterization of Thin Thermal Oxide Layers on Polycrystalline Aluminium

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

F. Degreve
Affiliation:
Cégédur Péchiney, Centre de Recherches, B.P. 27, 38340 Voreppe, France.
J. M. Lang
Affiliation:
Cégédur Péchiney, Centre de Recherches, B.P. 27, 38340 Voreppe, France.
Get access

Abstract

Thermal oxide layers of different thickness (T = 3.5–18 am) covering polycrystalline aluminium sheets were investigated by dynamic SIMS in an ion microscope. Depth profiles of major elements (Al, O), segregated impurities in the oxide layer (Li, Na, Be, Mg) and implanted 18O were recorded for different operating conditions : energy, incident angle, chemical (Ar+ or O2+) and isotopic (16O2+ or 18O2+) nature of the primary beam and oxygen jet to saturate the surface.

The main results are:

- the shape of the depth profiles is very sensitive to operating conditions : the best depth resolution is obtained at low energy (2.5 keV) and the minimal distorsion with an O2 jet, even under O2+ bombardment. Deconvolution would be necessary to deduce the true depth profiles.

- a tremendous enrichment (103 – 104) of the oxide to the Al bulk is observed for Li, Na, Be and Mg via an efficient diffusion mechanism during heat 425°C. Their depth distribution within the oxide layer is heterogenous with surface enrichment for Li and Na and sub-layer (towards the oxide/metal interface) for Be lateral distribution below the interface is also heterogeneous e.g. at the grain boundaries for Be and Na.

- the depth profile of implanted 18O+ versus operating conditions and oxide thickness gives direct information on the dynamic oxidation of Al induced by O2+ sputtering in the first 20 nm.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1) Wefers, K., Aluminium, 57, 722(1981).Google Scholar
(2) Textor, M. and Grauer, R., Corrosion Science, 23, 41(1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(3) Csanady, A., Marton, D., Köver, L. and Toth, J., Aluminium, 58, 280(1982).Google Scholar
(4) Holub, K.J. and Matenzio, L.J., Appl. Surf. Sci., 9, 22(1981).Google Scholar
(5) Bas, E.B., Pan, X.P., Rüegg, K.J. and Stucki, F., Surf. Sci., 138, 172(1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(6) Goldstein, B. and Dresdner, J., Surf. Sci., 71, 15(1978).Google Scholar
(7) Gourgout, J.M., in “Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry-SIMS II”, Springer Verlag, Berlin, p 286(1979).Google Scholar
(8) Lang, J.M. and Degrève, F., Surf. Interface Anal., 7, 53(1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(9) Degrève, F. and Lang, J.M., Surf. Interface Anal., to be published.Google Scholar
(10) Tran Minh Duc, private communication (1982).Google Scholar
(11) Degrève, F., J. Microsc. Spectrosc. Electron., 6, 223(1981).Google Scholar
(12) Hofmann, S. in “Practical Surface Analysis by Auger and X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy”, Briggs, D. and Seah, M.P. Ed., J. Wiley, Chichester, p 141(1983).Google Scholar
(13) Werner, H.W., Surf. Interface Anal., 4, 1(1982).Google Scholar
(14) Andersen, C.A., in “Microprobe Analysis”, Andersen, C.A., Ed., J. Wiley (N.Y.), p 535 and 547 (1972).Google Scholar
(15) Hugh, J.A. Mc, in “Methods of Surface Analysis”, Elsevier Scientific Company, Amsterdam, p 223(1975).Google Scholar
(16) Joud, J.C., Faure, R., Namdar-Irani, R., Pichard, C. and Poyet, p., Mém. Et. Sci. Rev. Métal., 235(1982).Google Scholar
(17) Lewis, R.K., Morabito, J.M. and Tsai, J.C.C., Appl. Phys. Lett., 23, 260(1973).Google Scholar
(18) Smithell's Metal Reference Book, Brandes, E.A. Ed., 6th Edition, Butterworths, London, p 1355, 56(1983).Google Scholar