Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:40:27.378Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Silicon-29 Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy of Silicon Ethoxide and Titanium Ethoxide Sols: Resonance Assignments and Solution Stability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

E. N. Boulos
Affiliation:
Product Research and Development Office, Glass Division, Ford Motor Company, Dearborn, Michigan, 41820
K. R. Carduner
Affiliation:
Research Staff, Scientific Research Laboratories, Ford Motor Company, Dearborn, Michigan, 48121
R. O. Carter III
Affiliation:
Research Staff, Scientific Research Laboratories, Ford Motor Company, Dearborn, Michigan, 48121
M. F. Best
Affiliation:
Product Research and Development Office, Glass Division, Ford Motor Company, Dearborn, Michigan, 41820
Get access

Abstract

Silicon-29 NMR spectroscopy has been widely applied to characterize the development of molecular complexity of silicon alkoxide sols. In the present study, the progression of molecular complexity of partially hydro-lyzed/condensed tetraethoxysilane (TEOS) sols with increasing H2O/TEOS ratio is demonstrated by the study of a carefully prepared set of solutions. Intriguing trends in the 29si NMR spectra of increasingly hydro-lyzed sols are discussed. In an set of samples, TEOS is replaced in part by tetraethoxytitane, Ti(OEt)4 (TEOT). The effects on the 29Si NMR spectrum due to the presence of TEOT are presented and interpreted in terms of changes in the distribution of siloxane monomers and oligomers in solution. Preliminary data on the stability of these solutions with time are reported.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

1. Yoldas, B. E., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 38+39, 81 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Klemperer, W. G., Mainz, V. V., and Miller, D. M., “Better Ceramics Through Chemistry II,” eds. Brinker, C. J., Clark, D. E., and Ulrich, D. R. (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, 1986), vol. 73, p. 3.Google Scholar
3. Kelts, L. W., Effinger, N. J., and Melpolder, S. M., J. Non. Cryst. Solids 83. 353 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Yoldas, B. E., J. Mater. Sci. 21, 1087 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Fukushima, E. and Roeder, S. B. W., “Experimental Pulse NMR: a Nuts and Bolts Approach” (Addison-Wesley, Ontario, 1981).Google Scholar
6. Williams, E. A. and Cargioli, J. D., Annu. Rep. NMR Spectrosc. 9, 221 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Carduner, K. R., Carter, R. O., Boulos, E. N., and Best, M. F., to be published.Google Scholar
8. Greegor, R. B., Lytle, F. W., Sandstrom, D. R., Wong, J., Schultz, P., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 55, 27 (1983).Google Scholar