Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:22:54.161Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Silicon Nitride Deposited at Very Low Silane Pressures Using Electron Cyclotron Resonance Plasmas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

J. R. Flemish
Affiliation:
U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Electronics and Power Sources Directorate Ft. Monmouth, NJ 07703.
R. Pfeffer
Affiliation:
U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Electronics and Power Sources Directorate Ft. Monmouth, NJ 07703.
W. Buchwald
Affiliation:
U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Electronics and Power Sources Directorate Ft. Monmouth, NJ 07703.
K. A. Jones
Affiliation:
U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Electronics and Power Sources Directorate Ft. Monmouth, NJ 07703.
Get access

Abstract

We report on the material properties of SiNx:H films deposited using a 2% SiH4/N2 mixture with additional N2 in an ECR reactor. Deposition rates, refractive index, and stoichiometry have been characterized using ellipsometry, Rutherford backscattering spectroscopy, and infrared spectroscopy. Reactor conditions of 2m Torr total pressure, 650W microwave power, and substrate temperature of 250°C result in high quality, stoichiometric silicon nitride. With a SiH4/N2 ratio = 0.003, hydrogen incorporation is approximately 1.5% and the refractive index is nr =2.0. Lower microwave power and a higher SiH4/N2 ratio result in slightly N-rich films which is attributable to increased H-incorporation. Higher total pressure results in significantly enhanced deposition rates, but with greatly increased H and O content.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Matsuo, S., in Handbook of Thin-Film Deposition Processes, edited by Schuegraf, K.K., (Noyes Publishers, Park Ridge NJ, 1988), p. 147.Google Scholar
2. Herak, T. V., Chau, T.T., Thomson, D.J., Mejia, S.R., Buchanan, D.A., and Kao, K.C., J. Appl. Phys. 65 (6), 2457 (1989).Google Scholar
3. Barbour, J.C., Stein, H.J., Popov, O.A., Yoder, M., and Outten, C.A., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 9 (3) 480 (1991).Google Scholar
4. Manabe, Y. and Mitsuyo, T., J. Appl. Phys. 66 (6), 2475 (1989).Google Scholar
5. Hirao, T., Setsune, K., Kitagawa, M., Kamada, T., Wasa, K., Tsukamoto, K., and Izumi, T., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 27 (1), 30 (1988).Google Scholar
6. Asmussen, J., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 7 (3), 883 (1989).Google Scholar
7. Lanford, W.A. and Rand, M.J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 49, 2473 (1978).Google Scholar
8. Hollahan, J.R. and Rosier, R.S., in Thin Film Processes, edited by Vossen, J.L. and Kern, W. (Academic Press, New York, 1978) p. 346.Google Scholar
9. Kern, W. and Rosier, R.S., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 14 (5) 1082 (1977).Google Scholar
10. Hattangady, S.V., Fountain, G.G., Rudder, R.A., and Markunas, R.J., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 7 (3), 570 (1989).Google Scholar