Hostname: page-component-669899f699-b58lm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-27T17:27:25.846Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Silicon Hydride Formation in Co-60 Irradiated Optical Fibers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

Bruce D. Evans
Bruce D. Evans*
Affiliation:
Boeing Electronics, High Technology Center, P.O. Box 24969, Seattle, W A 98124-6269
Get access

Abstract

Doping with hydrogen is shown to reduce the sensitivity of optical fibers to form optical attenuation bands as a result of ionizing radiation and to increase the recovery rate in the near infrared after the exposure. In this case silicon hydride is shown to form in low-OH, pure silica fibers upon Co-60 irradiation. The ratio of radiolytically induced changes in silicon hydride to silicon hydroxide is estimated to be greater than ten. The more numerous radiolytic formation of SiH species implies the participation of oxygen vacancy type defects in the radiolytic process.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 152: Symposium H – Optical Materials: Processing and Science , 1989 , 245
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

1. Faile, S.P., Schmidt, J.J. and Roy, D.M., Science 156, 1593 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Shelby, J.E., J. Appl. Phys. 50 (5), 3702 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Griscom, D.L., J. Non-Crystal. Solids 68, 301 (1984).Google Scholar
4. Evans, B.D., in Fiber Optics Reliability: Benign and Adverse Environments II, edited by Paul, D.K., Greenwell, R.A., and Wadekar, S.G. (SPIE Proc. 992, Bellingham, WA 1988) pp. 120–128.Google Scholar
5. Evans, B.D., IEEE Trans. on Nucl. Sci. 35 (6), 1215 (1988).Google Scholar
6. Kaiser, P., Tynes, A.R., Astles, H.W., Pearson, A.D., French, W.G., Jaeger, R.E. and Cherin, A.H., J. Opt. Soc. Am. 63, 1141 (1973).Google Scholar
7. Johnston, A.H., Evans, B.D., Baze, M.P. and Greenwell, R.A., in Optical Devices in Adverse Environments, edited by Greenwell, R.A. (SPIE Vol.867, Bellingham, WA 1987) pp. 25–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Sakaguchi, S., Itoh, H., Hanawa, F. and Kimura, T., Appl. Phys. Lett. 47, 344 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Hetherington, G. and Jack, K.H., Phys. and Chem. of Glasses 3, (4) 129 (1962).Google Scholar
10. Lemaire, P.J. and deCoteau, M.D., in Optical Fiber Materials and Properties, edited by Nagel, S.R., Sigel, G. Jr., Fleming, J.W., and Thompson, D.A. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 88, Pittsburg, PA 1987) pp. 225–232.Google Scholar