Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T18:05:54.568Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Short-Range to Long-Range Ordering Reactions in a Ni-25Mo-8Cr Alloy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Mukul Kumar
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221
Vijay K. Vasudevan
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221
Get access

Abstract

The transformation from short-range↔long-range order in Haynes® Alloy 242, a nominal Ni-25Mo-8Cr (in wt.%) alloy, during both continuous heating and cooling and isothermal holding at temperatures between 550 and 750°C is reported using dilatometry and microhardness measurements, and optical and transmission electron microscopy The long-range to short-range order transformation temperature was observed to increase with an increase in the degree of prior order. Aging below the transformation temperature led to considerable hardening; this hardening was associated with the formation of a very high volume fraction of Ni2Mo domains/precipitates. On aging at 700°C and below, the hardness initially increases and then levels off, with no evidence of overaging for times to 2000 hours. The role of both short- and long-range order on the transformation temperature, thermal expansion and hardening behavior and the mechanisms of transformation from short-range to long-range order were established and will be discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Hodge, F. G. and Kirchner, R. W., Materials Performance, 15, 40 (1976).Google Scholar
2. Harker, D., J. Chem. Phys., 12, 315 (1944).Google Scholar
3. Guthrie, P. V. and Stansbury, E. E., ORNL Report 3078, ORNL, Oak Ridge, TN (1961).Google Scholar
4. Stansbury, E. E., Vasudevan, K. and Lei, T. S., Microstructural Science, 13, 197 (1985).Google Scholar
5. Lei, T. S., Vasudevan, K. and Stansbury, E. E., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 39, 163 (1985).Google Scholar
6. Snyder, W. B. and Brooks, C. R., in: Ordered Alloys - Structural Applications and Physical Metallurgy, Kear, B. H., Sims, C. T., Stoloff, N. S. and Westbrook, J. H. (eds.), Claitor's, Baton Rouge, LA, p. 275 (1970).Google Scholar
7. Chakravarti, B., Starke, E. A. Jr., and LeFevre, B. G., J. Mater. Sci., 5, 394 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Saburi, T., Fujii, H. and Nenno, S., J. Phys. Soc. Japan, 35, 13861 (1973).Google Scholar
9. Brooks, C. R., Spruiell, J. E. and Stansbury, E. E., Int. Metall. Rev., 29, 210 (1984).Google Scholar
10 Srivastava, S. K. and Rothman, M. F., in: Proc. High Temperature Materials for Power Systems Liege, Belgium, In Press (1990).Google Scholar
11. Vasudevan, K. and Stansbury, E. E., Scripta Metall., 19, 1101 (1985).Google Scholar
12 Kumar, M., M. S.Thesis, University of Cincinnati (1990).Google Scholar
13. Kumar, M. and Vasudevan, V. K., to be published.Google Scholar
14. Das, S. K., and Thomas, G., Phys. Stat. Sol. (a), 21, 177 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. DeFontaine, D., Acta Metall., 23, 553 (1975).Google Scholar
16. Banerjee, S., Urban, K. and Wilkens, M., Acta Metall., 32, 299 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Vasudevan, K. and Stansbury, E. E., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 62, 337 (1986).Google Scholar