Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T14:10:50.412Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sensitivity Analysis of Uranium Solubility Under Strongly Oxidizing Conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

L. Liu
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
I. Neretnieks
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
Get access

Abstract

To evaluate the effect of geochemical conditions in the repository on the solubility of uranium under strongly oxidizing conditions, a mathematical model has been developed to determine the solubility, by utilizing a set of non linear algebraic equations to describe the chemical equilibria in the groundwater environment. The model takes into account the predominant precipitation-dissolution reactions, hydrolysis reactions and complexation reactions that may occur under strongly oxidizing conditions. The model also includes the solubilitylimiting solids induced by the presence of carbonate, phosphate, silicate, calcium, and sodium in the groundwater. The thermodynamic equilibrium constants used in the solubility calculations are essentially taken from the NEA Thermochemical Data Base of Uranium, with some modification and some uranium minerals added, such as soddyite, rutherfordite, uranophane, uranyl orthophosphate, and becquerelite. By applying this model, the sensitivities of uranium solubility to variations in the concentrations of various groundwater component species are systematically investigated. The results show that the total analytical concentrations of carbonate, phosphate, silicate, and calcium in deep groundwater play the most important role in determining the solubility of uranium under strongly oxidizing conditions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. SKB-91: SKB Technical Report 92-20 (1992).Google Scholar
2. Sunder, S., Shoesmith, D.W., Atomic Energy of Canada Limited Report, AECL-10395 (1991).Google Scholar
3. Grenthe, I., Fuger, J., Konings, R.J.M., Lemire, R.J., Muller, A.B., Nguyen-Trung, C., Wanner, H., OECD/NEA, North Holland (1992).Google Scholar
4. Sandino, A., Bruno, J., Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 56, 4135 (1992).Google Scholar
5. Casas, I., Bruno, J., Cera, E., Finch, R., Ewing, R.C., SKB Technical Report 94-16 (1994).Google Scholar
6. Stumm, W., Morgan, J.J., Aquatic Chemistry, An Introduction Emphasizing Chemical Equilibria in Natural Waters, 780 pp., John Wiley, New York (1981).Google Scholar
7. Liu, L., Neretnieks, I., presented at the 1998 MRS Fall Meeting, Boston, USA, (1998).Google Scholar
8. Sandino, A., Grambow, B., Radiochimica Acta, 66/67, 37 (1994).Google Scholar
9. Moll, H., Geipel, G., Matz, W., Bernhard, G., Nitsche, H., Radiochimica Acta, 74, 3 (1996).Google Scholar
10. Casas, I., Perez, I., Torrero, E., Bruno, J., Cera, E., Duro, L., SKB Technical Report 97-15 (1997).Google Scholar
11. Miyahara, K., Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, 30, 314 (1993).Google Scholar
12. Lemire, R.J., Atomic Energy of Canada Limited Report, AECL-9549 (1988).Google Scholar
13. Lemire, R.J., Garisto, F., Radiochimica Acta, 58/59, 37 (1992).Google Scholar
14. Wanner, H., Nuclear Technology, 79, 338 (1987).Google Scholar