Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T17:59:13.510Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Self-mobility System Design for Paraplegic Patients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2015

Ing. Mauricio Plaza Torres  and
Ing. William Aperador
Ing. Mauricio Plaza Torres
Affiliation:
Universidad Militar Nueva Granada, Carrera 11, N° 101-80, Bogotá, Colombia.
Ing. William Aperador
Affiliation:
Universidad Militar Nueva Granada, Carrera 11, N° 101-80, Bogotá, Colombia.
Get access

Abstract

Tumors of the distal and proximal femur are treated by total femur resection. A hip disarticulation sometimes is a result of massive trauma with crush injuries to the lower extremity. This article discusses a system designed for patient rehabilitation with bilateral hip disarticulations. The prosthetics designed allowed a patient to attain natural gait suspended between parallel articulate crutches with the body weight supported between the crutches. The design is patent pending and it could be used in people with a simple ankle sprain, people with partial immobilizations in inferior members, or people with bilateral hip disarticulation. The final design system allows patients with bilateral hip replacement or partial immobilizations to attain mobility in a natural way.

Keywords

metalwaste managementhardness
Type
Articles
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1765: Symposium 4A – Advanced Structural Materials—2014 , 2015 , pp. 45 - 50
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Coley, B.L., Higinbotham, N.L. and Romieu, C., Am. J. Surg. 82, 27–43 (1951).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dankmeyer, C.H. Jr., Orthot. Prosthet. 35, 11–18 (1981).Google Scholar
Davis, B.P., Warner, R., Daniel, R. and Georgi, W.H., Inter-Clin. Info. Bull. 3, 5–9 (1964).Google Scholar
Desio, M.A. and Leonard, J.A., Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 67, 667–668 (1986).Google Scholar
Foort, J., Artif. Limbs 4, 52–70 (1957).Google Scholar
Friedmann, L., Orthot. Prosthet. 21, 271–273 (1967).Google Scholar
Giaccone, V. and Stack, D., Phys. Ther. 57, 1394–1396 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillis, L., J. Bone Joint Surg. 50B, 389–391 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glattly, H.W., Artif. Limbs 7, 5–10 (1963); M. Greene, Orthot. Prosthet. 37, 15-24(1983).Google Scholar
Hampton, F., Artif. Limbs 8, 3–27 (1964).Google Scholar
Hampton, F., in A Hemipelvectomy Prosthesis, (Northwestern University Prosthetic Research Center, Chicago, 1964), p. 32.Google ScholarPubMed
Huang, C.T., J. Med. Assoc. State Ala. 52, 47–48 (1983).Google Scholar
Hutter, C.G., J. Bone Joint. Surg. 35, 745–748 (1953).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imler, C. and Quigley, M., J. Prosthet. Orthot. 3, 34–37 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iwakura, H., Abe, M., Fujinaga, H., Kakurai, S. and Yano, H., Prosthet. Orthot. Int. 3, 111–114 (1979).Google Scholar
Jay, G.R. and Sabolich, L., Inter-Clin. Info. Bull. 11, 9–12 (1972).Google Scholar
Jensen, J.S. and Mandrup-Poulsen, T., Prosthet. Orthot. Int. 7, 119–122 (1983).Google Scholar
Lehneis, H.R., in Prosthetics Management for High Level Lower Limb Amputees, (Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine, New York, 1980).Google Scholar
Leppanen, R.E., Phys. Ther. 49, 987–990 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Littig, D.H. and Lundt, J.E., Clin. Prosthet. Orthot. 12, 114–118 (1988).Google Scholar
Lyquist, E., Artif. Limbs 5, 130–132 (1958).Google Scholar
Madden, M., Orthot. Prosthet. 39, 44–47 (1985).Google Scholar
Marx, H.W., Orthot. Prosthet. 04, 259–270 (1967).Google Scholar
McLaurin, C.A., Report No. 15, Prosthetic Services Centre, Department of Veterans Affairs, Toronto, Canada, 1954.Google Scholar
Pinzur, M.S., Sakols, R., Lopez, C., Tirimacco, P. and Osterman, H., Orthot. Prosthet. 40, 58–60 (1986).Google Scholar
Radcliffe, C.W., Artif. Limbs. 4, 29–38 (1956).Google Scholar
Sabolich, J. and Guth, T., Clin. Prosthet. Orthot. 12, 119–122 (1988).Google Scholar
Shurr, D.G., Cook, T.M., Buckwalter, J.A. and Cooper, R.R., Orthot. Prosthet. 37, 50–57 (1983).Google Scholar
Simons, B.C., Lehman, J.F., Taylor, N. and DeLateur, B.J., Orthot. Prosthet. 22, 63–68 (1968).Google Scholar
Solomonidis, S.E., Loughran, A.J., Taylor, J. and Paul, J.P., Prosthet. Orthot. 1nt. 1, 13–18 (1977).Google Scholar
Vanderwaarde, T., Orthot. Prosthet. 38, 29–35 (1984).Google Scholar
Waters, R.L., Perry, J., Antonelli, D. and Hislop, H., J. Bone Joint Surg. 58, 42–46 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar