Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T01:38:33.202Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Self-Assembly of Silicate/Surfactant Mesophases

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

Scott A. Walker  and
J.A. Zasadzinski
Scott A. Walker
Affiliation:
Dept. of Chemical Engineering, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106
J.A. Zasadzinski
Affiliation:
Dept. of Chemical Engineering, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106
Get access

Abstract

The synthesis of silicate/surfactant mesophases is driven by cooperative assembly of organic surfactant and inorganic silicate species, and the resultant mesophase morphology can be controlled by synthesis conditions (i.e., CTAB concentration in precursor solution and SiO2- CTAB mole ratio). The self-assembly process of these mesophases is driven complexation of the polyanionic silicate species with several CTAB cations to form a multi-tailed surfactant. One of these mesophases is a novel rippled lamellar phase in which the ripple wavelength and lamellar spacing are similar to the hexagonal mesophase rod center-to-center spacing; each of these dimensions are consistent with the length of two CTAB molecules.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 371: Symposium W1 – Advances in Porous Materials , 1994 , 93
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Kresge, C.T., Leonowicz, M.E., Roth, W.J., Vartuli, J.C., Beck, J.S., Nature 359, 710 (1992);Google Scholar
Beck, J.S. et al. , J. Am. Chem. Soc. 114, 10834 (1992).Google Scholar
2. IUPAC Manual of Symbols and Terminology, Appendix 2, Part 1, Colloid and Surface Chemistry, Pure Appl. Chem. 31, 578 (1972).Google Scholar
3. Heuer, A.H. et al. , Science 255, 1098 (1992).Google Scholar
4. Chen, C.-Y., Burkett, S.L., Li, J.-X., Davis, M.E., Microporous Materials 2, 27 (1993);Google Scholar
Steel, A., Carr, S.W., Anderson, M.W., J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1571 (1994).Google Scholar
5. Firouzi, A. et al. , Science, in press (1994).Google Scholar
6. Wiebcke, M. and Hoebbel, D., J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. 16, 2451 (1992);Google Scholar
Harris, R. and Knight, C.T.G., J. Mol. Struct. 78, 273 (1982);Google Scholar
Groenen, E.J.J. et al. , Zeolites 6, 402 (1986);Google Scholar
Hendricks, W.M., Bell, A.T., Radke, C.J., Phys, J., Chem. 95, 9519 (1991);Google Scholar
Knight, C.T.G., Zeolites 9, 448 (1989).Google Scholar
7. Auvray, X. et al. , J. Phys. Chem. 93, 7458 (1989); T. Wamheim and A. Jonsson, J. Coll. Int. Sci. 125, 627 (1988).Google Scholar
8. Seelig, J., Quart. Rev. Biophys., 10, 353 (1977).Google Scholar
9. Israelachvili, J. N., Mitchell, D.J., Ninham, B.W., J.Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. II 72, 1525 (1976).Google Scholar
10. Kaler, E.W., Murthy, A.K., Rodriguez, B., Zasadzinski, J.A.N., Science 245, 1371 (1989).Google Scholar
11. The authors would like to thank Firouzi, A. and Kumar, D. for sample preparation, A. Firouzi and B.F. Chmelka for 2H NMR spectroscopy and analysis, and G. Stucky for useful discussions.Google Scholar