Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:47:52.586Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Self-Assembly of Bacterial Macrofibers: A System Based Upon Hierarchies of Helices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

Neil H. Mendelson
Neil H. Mendelson*
Affiliation:
University of Arizona, Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Life Sciences South Building, Tucson, Arizona
Get access

Abstract

Cylindrical-shaped cells of Bacillus subtilis (0.7 by 4 μm) are the building blocks of macrofibers, highly organized, helically twisted, multifilament structures millimeters to centimeters in length. The forces responsible for self-assembly and the cylinder-helix deformation trace to the assembly of cell wall polymers and restraint of the motions generated by cell growth. An hierarchical relationship exists involving: (i) molecular level events associated with cell surface assembly, which in turn govern, (ii) cellular level events concerned with motions that accompany cell growth, and these in turn drive, (iii) multicellular level events such as the folding and plying of cell filaments to form a mature macrofiber. Cell growth generates new material and engenders twisting of the cell cylinder along a screw axis as it elongates. The helix hand and degree of twist at the cellular level eventually dictate the hand and twist of the mature multifilament macrofiber. Although several different routes can lead to the initiation of macrofiber production, once initiated a repetitive cycle of folding and plying becomes established. The self-assembly proceeds until mechanical and geometrical factors preclude further folding cycles.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 255: Symposium Z – Hierarchically Structured Materials , 1991 , 43
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Mendelson, N.H., Sci. Progress Oxford, 74, 425 (1990).Google Scholar
2. Mendelson, N.H., J. Bacteriol., 151, 438 (1982).Google Scholar
3. Mendelson, N.H., Favre, D., and Thwaites, J.J., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 81, 3562 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Mendelson, N.H., Microbiol. Revs. 46, 341 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Trueba, F.J. and Woldringh, C.L., J. Bacteriol., 142, 869 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Briehl, M.M. and Mendelson, N.H., J. Bacteriol., 169, 5838 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Mendelson, N.H., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 73, 1740 (1976).Google Scholar
8. Carnaby, G.A., in The Mechanirs Of Flexible Fibre Assemblies, edited by Hearle, J.W.S., Thwaites, J.J., and Amirbayat, J. (Sijthoff & Noordhoff, Germantown, MD, 1980), p. 99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Mendelson, N.H. and Thwaites, J.J., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 174, 171 (1990).Google Scholar
10. Thompson, D'A. W., On growth and form (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1961).Google Scholar
11. Mendelson, N.H., Comments Theoretical Biology, 1, 217 (1989).Google Scholar
12. Mendelson, N.H., J. Bacteriol., 170, 2336 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Gasser, S.M. and Laemmli, U.K., Trends in Genet., 3, 16 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar