Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-fr72s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-11T10:03:23.610Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Self Assembly in Biologically Synthesized Electrospun Electroactive Polymers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

A. Bishop  and
P. Gouma
A. Bishop
Affiliation:
[email protected], SUNY Stony Brook, 314 Old Engineering, Stony Brook, NY, 11794-2275, United States
P. Gouma
Affiliation:
[email protected], SUNY Stony Brook, United States
Get access

Abstract

The processing parameters of polyaniline (PANI) dictate the desired morphology and overall structural stability of the deposited polymer for biological and chemical sensor applications. Electrospun composites of leucoemeraldine based PANI (LEB-PANI) has exhibited effective separation of aggregates inherent in LEB-PANI powder as a result of charge separation induced on the composite matrix during electrospinning. However it appears the encapsulation of biological (enzyme-Urease E.C.3.5.1.5) in the electrospun matrix intensifies the self assembly process. An investigation of the changes in morphology as an effect of electrospinning and enzyme immobilization is discussed.

Keywords

self-assemblysensorcomposite
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 889: Symposium W – Electroresponsive Polymers and Their Applications , 2005 , 0889-W01-06
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

[1] Campos, M. and Bello, B., J. Chem. Phys. 7, 235 (1990)Google Scholar
[2] Angelopoulous, M., Dipietro, R., Zheng, W., MacDiarmid, A.G., and Epstein, A.J., Synthetic. Metals, 84, 35 (1997)Google Scholar
[3] Schreuder-Gibson, H., Gibson, P., Tsai, P., Gupta, P., and Wilkes, G., Inter. Nonwoven Journal, 13 (4), 39 (2004)Google Scholar
[4] Theron, S.A., Zuessman, E. and Yarin, A.L, Polymer 45 (6), 2017 (2004)Google Scholar
[5] Stejskal, J., Kratochvil, P.. And Helmstedt, M., Langmuir, 12, 3389 (1996)Google Scholar
[6] Armes, S., Handbook of Conducting Polymers, Ed. Skotheim, T., Elsenbaumer, R., Reynolds, J., (Marcel Dekker Inc. 1998) p. 423–436 Google Scholar
[7] Murugesan, R., Anitha, G., and Subramanian, E., Mat. Chem. and Phy., 85, 184 (2004)Google Scholar
[8] Somani, P., Mat. Chem. and Phy., 77, 81 (2002)Google Scholar
[9] Gerard, M., Chaubey, A., and Malhotra, B.D., Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 17, 345 (2002)Google Scholar
[10] Tahir, Z., Alociljia, E., and Grooms, D., Biosensors and Bioelctronics, (2004) in pressGoogle Scholar
[11] Pandey, P. and Singh, G., Talanta, 55, 773 (2001)Google Scholar
[12] Castillo-Ortega, M., Rodriguez, D.E., Encinas, J.C., Plascencia, M., Mendez-Velarde, F.A., and Olayo, R., Sens. Act. B, 85 19 (2002)Google Scholar
[13] Sangodkar, H., Sukeerthi, S., Srinivasa, R.S., Lal, R., and Contractor, A.Q., Anal. Chem, 68, 779 (1996)Google Scholar
[14] Sawicka, K.M., Gouma, P., and Simon, S., Sens. Act. B (2005) in printGoogle Scholar
[15] Bishop, A. and Gouma, P., Rev. Adv. Mater. Sci, 10, 209 (2005)Google Scholar
[16] Matsveeva, E.S., Synth. Met., 79, 127 (1996)Google Scholar