Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T16:03:08.449Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Segregation of Cu on Etched and Non-Etched Al(Cu) Surface

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Hua Li
Affiliation:
IMEC, Kapeldreef 75, 3001 Leuven, Belgium
Karen Maex
Affiliation:
IMEC, Kapeldreef 75, 3001 Leuven, Belgium
Bert Brijs
Affiliation:
IMEC, Kapeldreef 75, 3001 Leuven, Belgium
Thierry Conard
Affiliation:
IMEC, Kapeldreef 75, 3001 Leuven, Belgium
Wilfried Vandervorst
Affiliation:
IMEC, Kapeldreef 75, 3001 Leuven, Belgium
Michael Baklanov
Affiliation:
IMEC, Kapeldreef 75, 3001 Leuven, Belgium
Werner Boullart
Affiliation:
IMEC, Kapeldreef 75, 3001 Leuven, Belgium
Ludo Froyen
Affiliation:
Dept.of Metallurgy and Materials Engineering, K.U. Leuven, 3001 Leuven, Belgium
Get access

Abstract

In this paper, we have studied the segregation phenomenon of Cu on the surfaces of patterned lines, dry-etched films and non-etched films, by using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and lower energy Rutherford Backscattering Spectrometry. Significant enrichment of Cu is found on the sidewall of the lines. Annealing at 350°C and above cause the disappearance of this enrichment. Origin and evolution of this Cu enrichment have been investigated on films taken out from different steps of the etching process. It has been found that most of the Cu products induced by the plasma etching are CuCl and CuCl2 and they are removed mostly from the top Al oxide layer by the strip process. On the interface area between Al and the native oxide, considerable quantities of etched induced Cu are retained. This Cu is identified to be mainly metallic Cu. Different from the mechanism explained above, thermal annealing can also cause Cu segregation. We have found that Cu atoms diffuse into the native Al oxide where they form Cu2O.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Hu, C.-K., Small, M.B., Rodbell, K.P., Stanis, C., Blauner, P., and Ho, P.S., Appl. Phys. Lett. 62, 1023 (1993).10.1063/1.108513Google Scholar
2. Auger, R.A., Wolters, R.A.M., Schmidt, W., Dirks, A.G., and Kordic, S., J. Appl. Phys. 79, 3003 (1996).10.1063/1.362653Google Scholar
3. Hu, C.-K., Small, M.B., and Ho, P.S., J. Appl. Phys. 74, 969 (1993).10.1063/1.354839Google Scholar
4. Michael, J.R., Romig, A.D. Jr., and Frear, D.R., in Structure/Property Relationships for Metal/Metal Interfaces, edited by Romig, A.D. Jr., Fowler, D.E., and Bristowe, P.D. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 229, Pittsburgh, PA, 1991), p.303.Google Scholar
5. Copel, M., Rodbell, K.P., and Tromp, R.M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 68, 1625 (1996).10.1063/1.115672Google Scholar
6. Aaron, H.B. and Aaronson, H.I., Acta Metall. 16, 789 (1968).10.1016/0001-6160(68)90097-7Google Scholar
7. Li, H. et al. , manuscript in preparation.Google Scholar
8. NIST X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy Database, Version 1.0, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, 1989.Google Scholar
9. Lee, W.-Y., Eldridge, J.M., and Schwartz, G.C., J. Appl. Phys. 52, 2994 (1981).10.1063/1.329043Google Scholar
10. Wolf, S. and Tauber, R.N., in Silicon Processing For The VLSI Era, V.1, Process Technology (Lattice Press, Sunset Beach, 1986), p. 559.Google Scholar