Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T08:37:53.998Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Segregation of Copper in Dilute Aluminum - Copper Alloys for Interconnects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

D.A. Smith
Affiliation:
IBM Research T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights NY 10598 Now at Stevens Institute of Technology, Castle Point on the Hudson, Hoboken, NJ 07030
M.B. Small
Affiliation:
Now consultant at 12 Creighton Lane, Scarborough, NJ 10510
A.J. Garratt-Reed
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Materials Science & Engineering, 13-1020
Get access

Abstract

It is well known that the resistance to electromigration of aluminum-based interconnects is enhanced by alloying with copper. The mechanism is thought to involve the segregation of copper to the grain boundaries. The copper concentration at grain boundaries has been measured in well annealed alloys, with the compositions A1-0.5wt% Cu and AI-2wt%Cu using a VG HB5 STEM. The grain structure was stabilized by an anneal at 673K for one hour and the grain boundaries were loaded with copper by an anneal for 90 hours at 503K. It was found that the copper concentration varied from boundary to boundary. With the assumption that the copper was concentrated in a single layer the saturation concentration of copper was found to be in the range 0.025 to 0.25. This corresponds to an enhancement of the copper concentration relative to that in the grain interiors by a factor in the range between 3 and 30. The higher value approaches the copper concentration which would correspond to a monolayer of theta phase. Extensive surface segregation, amounting to a monolayer equivalent was also detected.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Ames, I., d'Heurle, F.M. and Hostman, R., IBM J. Res. Develop. 14, 461 (1970)Google Scholar
2. d'Heurle, F.M. and Rosenberg, R., in Physics of Thin Films, Ed. Hass, E., Francomb, M.H. and Hoffman, R.W. (Academic, New York, 1973) Vol 7, pg. 257 Google Scholar
3. d'Heurle, F.M. and Ho, P.S. in Thin Films; Interdiffusion and Reactions, Ed. Poate, J.M. and Tu, K.N. (Wiley, New York) pg. 243 Google Scholar
4. Seah, M.P. and Hondros, E.D., Proc. Roy. Soc., London, Ser. A 335, 191 (1973)Google Scholar
5. Rosenberg, R., J. Vac. Sci. Tech. 9 263 (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Frear, D.R., Sanchez, J.E., Romig, A.D. and Morris, J.W., Met. Trans. A 21 2449 (1990)Google Scholar
7. Michael, J.R., Romig, A.D., and Frear, D.R., Mat. Res. Soc. Sym. 229 303 (1991)Google Scholar
8. Garratt-Reed, A.J., Mat. Res, Soc. Sym. 62 115 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Garratt-Reed, A.J., Proc. 50th Ann. Mtg. Electron. Mic. Soc. of America, Ed. Bailey, G.W., Bently, J. and Small, J.A., San Francisco Press 1206 (1992)Google Scholar
10. Cliff, G. and Lorimer, G.W., J. Microscopy, 103 203 (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Goldstein, J.I., Williams, D.B. and Cliff, G. in “Quantitative X-ray Analysis, Principles of Analytical Electron Microscopy” Ed. Joy, D.C., Romig, A.D. and Goldstein, J.I., Plenum Press (1986) Chapter 5Google Scholar
12. Mondolfo, L.F., Aluminum Alloys: Structure and Properties, Butterworth, London, (1976) pg. 254 Google Scholar
13. Hu, C.K., Small, M.B. and Ho, P.S. J., App. Phys. 74, 969 (1993)Google Scholar