Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T01:13:46.184Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Seebeck Coefficient Effects of Nanoscale Conductors in a Gaseous Flow Environment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 August 2011

Patrick L. Garrity  and
Kevin L. Stokes
Patrick L. Garrity
Affiliation:
Loyola University New Orleans, Department of Physics, 6363 St. Charles Ave., New Orleans, LA 70118, USA
Kevin L. Stokes
Affiliation:
Advanced Materials Research Institute, University of New Orleans Lakefront, New Orleans, LA 70148, USA
Get access

Abstract

The surrounding ambient introduces a gaseous boundary to many potential nanotechnology applications such as nanoscale thermoelectric devices and low dimensional thermal control devices. Despite the large surface area to volume ratio of nanostructures, a formal study of the surface scattering effects induced by a gaseous boundary has received little attention. In this work, we consider the perturbing effects to the electron cloud or jellium of conducting nanostructures when submitted to a gaseous interface of varying interaction energies. Specifically, we incorporate the novel experimental method of Dynamic Electron Scattering (DES) to measure the Seebeck coefficient of 30 nm thick Au and Cu metal films in He and Ar atmospheres. The gas particle impact energy is varied by changing the flow speed from stationary (non-moving gas field) to high speed flow over the metal films. The scattering effects of each gas are clearly observable through a Seebeck coefficient increase as the gas impact energy increases. We find the high collision density of He to induce a greater increase in thermopower than the much heavier Ar with lower collision density. The perturbed transport properties of the Au and Cu thin films are explained by kinetic surface scattering mechanisms that dominate the scattering landscape of high surface area to volume ratio materials as suggested by comparative measurements on bulk Cu.

Keywords

electronic materialthermoelectricitythin film
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1329: Symposium I – Nanoscale Heat Transfer–Thermoelectrics, Thermophotovoltaics and Emerging Thermal Devices , 2011 , mrss11-1329-i11-01
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Luth, H., Solid Surfaces, Interfaces and Thin Films, 4th ed., (Springer, New York, 2001).Google Scholar
2. Benedek, G. and Valbusa, U. (ed.), Dynamics of Gas-Surface Interaction, (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1982).Google Scholar
3. Billing, G. D., Molecule Surface Interactions, (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2000).Google Scholar
4. Kaden, C., Ruggerone, P., Toennies, J. P., Zhang, G. and Benedek, G., Phys. Rev. B, 46, 13509 (1992).Google Scholar
5. Luo, N. S., Ruggerone, P. and Toennies, J. P., Physica Scripta, T49, 584 (1993).Google Scholar
6. Sumanasekera, G. U., Adu, C. K. W., Fang, S. and Eklund, P. C., Phys. Rev. Lett., 85, 1096 (2000).Google Scholar
7. Romero, H. E., Bolton, K., Rosen, A. and Eklund, P. C., Science, 307, 89–93 (2005).Google Scholar
8. Yu, H. Y., Kang, B. H., Pi, U. H., Park, C. W. and Choi, S. Y., Appl. Phys. Lett., 86, 253102–1 (2005).Google Scholar
9. Sood, A. K. and Ghosh, S., Phys. Rev. Lett., 93, 086601–1 (2004).Google Scholar
10. Ghosh, S., Sood, Ak. and Kumar, N., Science, 299, 1042 (2003).Google Scholar
11. Garrity, P., J. Appl. Phys., 109, 073701 (2011).Google Scholar
12. Garrity, P. and Stokes, K., Phil. Mag., 89, 2129 (2009).Google Scholar
13. Garrity, P., Nanoscale Thermal Fluctuation Spectroscopy, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of New Orleans (2009).Google Scholar
14. Kubo, R., Yokota, M. and Nakajima, S., J. Phys. Soc. Japan., 12, 1203 (1957).Google Scholar