Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:36:22.174Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

-Search For a Correlation Between Stoichiometry,TSC Spectra and -NUclear Spectroscopic Capabilities of HCI2.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

A. Tadjine
Affiliation:
Centre De Recherches Nucleaires, Laboratoire Phase 67037 Strasbourg CedexFrance
D. Gosselin
Affiliation:
Centre De Recherches Nucleaires, Laboratoire Phase 67037 Strasbourg CedexFrance
J.M. Koebel
Affiliation:
Centre De Recherches Nucleaires, Laboratoire Phase 67037 Strasbourg CedexFrance
P. Siffert
Affiliation:
Centre De Recherches Nucleaires, Laboratoire Phase 67037 Strasbourg CedexFrance
Get access

Abstract

Mercuric iodide is, potentially, an interesting material for room temperature high efficiency gamma or X-ray spectroscopy. However, still several parameters limit the performance of these devices and even the crystal growth is not fully under control today, poor reproductibility being reached.An optimization of growth conditions seems difficult since no parameter of the material could be correlated with the spectrometer's performance. Therefore, the effective progress in recent years was rather limited.

The goal of this paper is to investigate systematically if a correlation can be found between bulk stoichiometry for crystal grown under certain conditions, thermally stimulated current (TSC) measurements and nuclear performance. In this study, two families of crystals could be identified. Best results are obtained for nearly stoichiometric materials, exhibiting a specific TSC spectrum. In particular, the peak appearing at 173 K constitutes a good indication of the detection capabilities of the material, both for spectroscopic resolution and polarization.

The growth conditions have been adjusted to produce in a fully reproducible way high performance devices.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Nicolau, I. F., Roland, G., Armand, M. F., Menard, J. C., Stoichiometry deviation in -Hgl2 to be published, CEA-CENG, LETI/CRM 85X, 38041 Grenoble Cedex FranceGoogle Scholar
2. Dishon, G., Schieber, M., Ben-Dor, L., Halitz, L., Mat. Res. Bull. 16, 565, (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Scharager, C., Tadjine, A., Toulemonde, M., Grob, J. J., Siffert, P. Proceeding of Nuclear Physics, 7th Divisional Conference Nuclear Physics Methods in Material Research Darmstadt (F. R. G.) (1980) Google Scholar
4. Scholtz, H., Philips Technical Review, 10, 317 (1967)Google Scholar
5. Workshop on Hgl2 , University of Strasbourg, Informal Proceeding, edited by Siffefdi, P.. (1975).Google Scholar
6. Bube, R. H., Phys. Rev., 106, 703 (1957).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Manfredotti, C., Murri, R., Pepe, E. and Semisa, D., Phys. Stat. Sol. (a) 20, 477 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manfredotti, C., Murri, R., Quirini, A. and Vasanelli, L., Phys. Stat.Sol. (a) 38,685 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Ponpon, J.P., Stuck, R., Siffert, P. and Schwab, C. Nucl. Instr. Meth. 119, 194 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Gelbart, U., Yacoby, Y. and Beinglass, I. and Holzer, A. IEEE Trans. on Nucl. Sci. NS 24, 135,(1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Whited, R.C. and Van Den Berg, L., IEEE Transactions on Nucl. Science, NS 24, 165 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Hyder, S.B., J. AppI. Phys., 48, 313 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. De Blasi, C., Galassini, S., Manfredotti, C., Micocci, G., Ruggiero, L. and Tepore, A., Nucl. Instr. and Methods, 150, 103 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Saura, J., Thesis Universidad de Cuyo, Argentina (1972).Google Scholar
14. Mohamed Brahim, T. , Internal. Report CEA (France) SES/INTERNE SAI/79–190.Google Scholar
15. Garlick, G.F.J. and Gibson, A.F., Proc. Phys. Soc., 60, 574 (1948).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Stuck, R., Muller, J. C., Ponpon, J. P., Scharager, C., Schwab, C., Siffert, P., Workshop on Hgl2 , University Strasbourg, informal Proc. edited by Siffert, P.. (1975)Google Scholar
17. Andrews, L.W., J.American Chem. Soc. 25, 756 (1903)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Rosin, J., “Reagent Chemicals and Standards” 5th Ed. Editor Van Nostram and Co - New York (1943).Google Scholar
19. Jameson, G.S., Amercian J. Sci., 33, 349 (1912).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Jameson, G.S. “Volumetric Iodate Methods”, The chemical Catalogue Co - New York (1926).Google Scholar
21. Kolthoff, I. M., Elwing, J. P., “Treatrise on chemical chemistry” Interscience Publishers - New York ,Part II, 3, 308 (1961).Google Scholar
22. Schwarzenbach, G. and Flaschka, H., “Die komplexometrische Titration”Google Scholar
23. , Perrin, Chemical Analysis vol. 33. “Masking and Demasking of Chemical reactions” Wiley, Interscience - New York. (1970).Google Scholar
24. Kolthoff, I. M. and Elwing, J.P., “Treatrise on chemical Chemistry” Interscience Publishers - New York PartI, 1, 588 (1961).Google Scholar