Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T01:56:35.305Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Screen Printed Frequency-Selective Surfaces on Rigid, Flexible and Elastic Substrates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Thomas Kistenmacher
Affiliation:
[email protected], Johns Hopkins University, Applied Physics Laboratory, 11100 Johns Hopkins Road, Laurel, MD, 20723, United States, (240) 228 5000, (240) 228 6904
Shaun Francomacaro
Affiliation:
[email protected], Johns Hopkins University, Applied Physics Laboratory, 11100 Johns Hopkins Road, Laurel, MD, 20723, United States
Ben Brawley
Affiliation:
[email protected], Johns Hopkins University, Applied Physics Laboratory, 11100 Johns Hopkins Road, Laurel, MD, 20723, United States
Ra'id Awadallah
Affiliation:
[email protected], Johns Hopkins University, Applied Physics Laboratory, 11100 Johns Hopkins Road, Laurel, MD, 20723, United States
Paul Vichot
Affiliation:
[email protected], Johns Hopkins University, Applied Physics Laboratory, 11100 Johns Hopkins Road, Laurel, MD, 20723, United States
Michael Fitch
Affiliation:
[email protected], Johns Hopkins University, Applied Physics Laboratory, 11100 Johns Hopkins Road, Laurel, MD, 20723, United States
Jane Spicer
Affiliation:
[email protected], Johns Hopkins University, Applied Physics Laboratory, 11100 Johns Hopkins Road, Laurel, MD, 20723, United States
Dennis Wickenden
Affiliation:
[email protected], Johns Hopkins University, Applied Physics Laboratory, 11100 Johns Hopkins Road, Laurel, MD, 20723, United States
Get access

Abstract

A series of frequency-selective surface (FSS) arrays based on nested split-ring triangle resonators have been fabricated using screen printing. A silver-filled polymer thick film (PTF) paste was selected as the active medium for the FSS arrays as it has good compatibility with the various substrates employed and is in itself naturally flexible. Substrates included FR4 boards and polyimide (PI), polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and silicone sheeting. Compared to arrays fabricated from Cu-clad FR4 board, the screen-printed arrays are resonance shifted owing to the magnitude of the dielectric constant and thickness of the various substrates. In addition, the quality factors of the screen-printed arrays are reduced compared to those fabricated from the more conductive Cu resonators. Despite these limitations, screen-printed arrays have considerable potential as components for low-cost flexible and conformal microwave devices.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Munk, B. A., Frequency Selective Surfaces: Theory and Design (John Wiley and Sons, Inc, New York, 2000).Google Scholar
2. Chang, K. and Hsieh, L-H., Microwave Ring Circuits and Related Structures, 2nd ed. (John Wiley and Sons, 2004).Google Scholar
3. Lin, S-Y, Modes-Controlled Slot Antennas with Frequency Controlled Surface, Microwave Opt. Technol. Lett. 48, 47 (2006).Google Scholar
4. Barbagallo, S., Monochio, A. and Manara, G., Small Periodicity FSS Screens with Enhanced Bandwidth Performance, Electron. Lett. 42, 382 (2006).Google Scholar
5. Kern, D. J. and Werner, D. H., A Genetic Algorithm Approach to the Design of Ultra-Thin Electromagnetic Bandgap Absorbers, Microwave Opt. Technol. Lett. 38, 61 (2003).Google Scholar
6. Marques, R., Baena, J. D., Beruete, M., Fakcone, F., Lopetegi, T., Sorolla, M., Martin, F. and Garcia, J., Ab initio Analysis of Frequency Selective Surfaces Based on Conventional and Complementary Split Ring Resonators, J. Opt. A. Pure Appl. Opt. 7, S38 (2005).Google Scholar
7. Mias, C., Tsakonas, C. and Oswald, C., An Investigation into the Feasibility of Designing Frequency Selective Windows Employing Periodic Structures, Final Report from The Nottingham Trent University to the Radiocommunications Agency (2002).Google Scholar
8. Bayindir, P., Aydin, K., Ozbay, E., Markos, P. and Soukoulis, C. M., Transmission Properties of Composite Metamaterials in Free Space, Appl. Phys. Lett. 81,120 (2002).Google Scholar
9. Shelby, R. A., Smith, D. R. and Schultz, S., Experimental Verification of a Negative Index of Refraction, Science 292, 77 (2001).Google Scholar
10. Wickenden, D. K., Awadallah, R. S., Vichot, P. A., Brawley, B. M., Spicer, J. M., Fitch, M. J and Kistenmacher, T. J., Demonstration of Multi-Band Frequency-Selective Surfaces Using Split-Ring Triangle Resonators, 2006 IEEE International Workshop on Antenna Technology, Small Antennas and Novel Metamaterials.Google Scholar
11. Kistenmacher, T. J., Brawley, B. M., Awadallah, R. S., Vichot, P. A., Fitch, M. J., Spicer, J. M. and Wickenden, D. K., An Innovative Unit Cell Guide to Multimodal Frequency-Selective Surfaces, IEEE-APS 2006.Google Scholar
12. Lacour, S. P., Chan, D., Wagner, S., Li, T. and Suo, Z., Mechanisms of Reversible Stetchability of Thin Metals on Elastomeric Substrates, Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 204103 (2006).Google Scholar