Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:31:27.327Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Scientific Basis for Long-Term Prediction of Waste-Form Performance Under Repository Conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

John E. Mendel*
Affiliation:
Materials Characterization Center, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington, USA
Get access

Extract

The reason for making long-term predictions of waste-form performance under repository conditions is to assess the impact of nuclear waste disposal upon the safety of future generations. Assessment of repository safety can be approached in two ways. One method is to define an acceptable release of radioactivity to the accessible environment, and to work back from that point to determine what kind of performance requirements are placed on the waste form. When this is done, it is found that the performance requirements for the waste form are not very restrictive. The waste form can dissolve completely in 100 to 10,000 years without affecting safety [1,2], because the repositories will be 300 meters or more underground. Radionuclide retardation on repository rocks and overburden and dilution during the long flow paths to the accessible environment become the controlling parameters.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Burkholder, H. C., “Engineered Components for Spent Fuel Radioactive Waste Isolation Systems—Are They Technically Justified?” to be published in: Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on the Scientific Basis for Radioactive Waste Management, June 7–10, 1982, Berlin, Federal Republic of Germany (North-Holland, New York 1982).Google Scholar
2. Koplik, C. M., Oston, S. G., Bartlett, J. W., and Kaplan, M. F., Status Report on Risk Assessment for Nuclear Waste Disposal, EPRI NP-1197, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, California (October 1979).Google Scholar
3. Chambre, P. L., Pigford, T. H., and Zavoshy, S., Solubility Limited Dissolution Rate in Groundwater, UCB-NE-4016, University of California, Berkeley, California (March 1982).Google Scholar
4. Savage, D. and Robbins, J. E., “The Interaction of Borosilicate Glass and Granodiorite at 100°C, 50 MPa: Implications for Models of Radionuclide Release,” to be published in: Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on the Scientific Basis for Radioactive Waste Management, June 7–10, 1982, Berlin, Federal Republic of Germany (North-Holland, New York 1982).Google Scholar
5. Bates, J. K., Jardine, L. G., and Steindler, M. J., Science, 218, 5154 (October 1, 1982).Google Scholar
6. Kuhn, W. L., “Source Term Modeling” in: Nuclear Waste Management Quarterly Progress Report, January Through March 1981, PNL–3000–9, Chikalla, T. D. and Powell, J. A. eds., Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington (June 1981).Google Scholar
7. Wood, B. J., Estimation of Waste Package Performance Requirements for a Basalt Waste Repository in Basalt, RHO-BWI-ST–10, Rockwell Hanford Operations, Richland, Washington (July 1980).Google Scholar
8. Ogard, A. et al. , “Are Solubility Limits of Importance in Leaching?” in: Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management, Volume 3, Moore, J. G. ed. (Plenum Press, New York 1981) pp. 331337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Rai, D. and Strickert, R. G., Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc. 35, 185186 (1980).Google Scholar
10.Materials Research Society, “Berlin, Scientific Basis for Radioactive Waste Management,” MRS Bulletin, Vol. VII, No. 3, p. 1 (May/June 1982).Google Scholar
11.Office of Nuclear Waste Isolation, Program Plan for the Development and Testing of NWTS Waste Package Materials (Draft), NWTS–34, Battelle-Columbus, Columbus, Ohio (March 1982).Google Scholar