Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T00:56:28.078Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Scenario Analysis and Conceptual Model Development Using FANFARE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

M Kelly  and
D.E. Billington
M Kelly
Affiliation:
Waste Environmental Group, AEA Technology, Didcot, Oxon, OX11 ORA Copyright AEA Technology 1997
D.E. Billington
Affiliation:
Waste Environmental Group, AEA Technology, Didcot, Oxon, OX11 ORA Copyright AEA Technology 1997
Get access

Abstract

A computer programme (FANFARE) for facilitating scenario analysis and conceptual model development is discussed. FANFARE implements a systematic methodology, based on the use of Directed Diagrams, that makes the assessment of comprehensiveness of FEPs and scenarios a tractable problem. Coupled with its ability to store a traceable audit trail of judgments and decisions, this makes FANFARE a useful tool for carrying out FEP analysis, scenario analysis and conceptual model development for performance assessments of radiological disposal facilities. It can also be applied to other systems that require consideration of the underlying phenomena to determine system performance.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 506: Symposium – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXI , 1997 , 701
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] NEA 1997, A report of the NEA Working Group on Development of a Database of Features, Events and Processes Relevant to the Assessment of Post-closure Safety of Radioactive Waste Repositories, draft. NEA (OECD), Paris.Google Scholar
[2] NEA 1992, Systematic Approaches to Scenario Development. Report of the NEA Working Group on the Identification and Selection of Scenarios for the Safety Assessment of Radioactive Waste Disposal. NEA (OECD), Paris.Google Scholar
[3] Chapman, N Andersson, J Robinson, P Skagius, K Wene, C-O Wiborgh, M and Wingefors, S, Systems Analysis, Scenario Construction and Consequence Analysis Definition for SITE-94, SKI Report 95:26, Stockholm.Google Scholar
[4] Hudson, J., Rock Engineering Systems: Theory and Practice, Ellis Horwood, Chichester, UK, 1992.Google Scholar
[5] Eng, T, Hudson, J, Stevensson, O, Skagius, K, and Wiborgh, M, Scenario Development Methodologies, SKB Technical Report 94-28, SKB, Stockholm.Google Scholar
[6] SKI SITE-94, Deep Repository Performance Assessment Project, SKI Report 96:36, Volume 1.Google Scholar