Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T13:39:19.648Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Scanning Force Microscopy Study of Phase Segregation in Fuel Cell Membrane Materials as a Function of Solvent Polarity and Relative Humidity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Marilyn Hawley
Affiliation:
[email protected], Los Alamos National Laboratory, Materials Science and Technology Division, Los Alamos, New Mexico, United States
Yu Seung Kim
Affiliation:
[email protected], Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, United States
Rex P. Hjelm
Affiliation:
[email protected], Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, United States
Get access

Abstract

Scanning force microscopy (SFM) phase imaging provides a powerful method for directly studying and comparing phase segregation in fuel cell membrane materials due to different preparation and under different temperature and humidity exposures. In this work, we explored two parameters that can influence phase segregation: the properties of the solvents used in casting membrane films and how these solvents alter phase segregation after exposure to boiling water as a function of time. SFM was used under ambient conditions to image phase segregation in Nafion samples prepared using five different solvents. Samples were then subjected to water vapor maintained at 100°C for periods ranging from 30 minutes to three hours and re-imaged using the same phase imaging conditions. SFM shows what appears to be an increase in phase segregation as a function of solvent polarity that changes as a function of water exposure.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Ma, C.-H., Yu, T.L., Lin, H.-L., Huang, Y.-T., Chen, Y.-L., Jeng, U-S., Lai, Y.-H., and Sun, Y.-S., Polymer 50, 1764 (2009).Google Scholar
2 Zawodzinski, T.A., Springer, T.E., Davey, J., Jestel, R., Lopez, C., Valerio, J., and Gottesfeld, S., J. Electrochem. Soc. 140, 1981 (1993)Google Scholar
3 Whangbo, M.-H., Magonov, S.N., and Elings, V., Surface Science 375(2-3), L385 (1997).Google Scholar
4 McLean, R.S. and Sauer, B., Macromolecules 30(26), 8314, (1997).Google Scholar
5 Einsla, Melinda L., Kim, Yu Seung, Hawley, Marilyn, Lee, Hae Seung, McGrath, James E., and Pivovar, Bryan S., Chem. Mat 20(17), 5636 (2008).Google Scholar
6 Hill, T.A., Carroll, D.L., Czerw, R., Martin, C.W., and Perahia, D., J. Polymer Sci. B: Polymer Phys. 41(2) , 149 (2003).Google Scholar
7 James, P.J., Antognozzi, M., Tamayo, J., McMaster, T.J., Newton, J.M., and Miles, M.J., Langmuir 17, 349 (2001).Google Scholar
8 James, P.J., McMaster, T.J., Newton, J.M., and Miles, M.J. Miles, Polymer 41, 4223 (2000).Google Scholar
9 Johnston, C.M., Lee, K.-S., Rockward, T., Labouriau, A., Welch, C., Orler, E.B., Hawley, M.E., Hjelm, R.P., Mack, N., and Kim, Y. S., “Non Non-aqueo aqueous Perfluorosulfonic Acid us Dispersions for Improved Fuel Cell Durability,” to be submitted for publication.Google Scholar