Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T09:35:54.093Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Scanning Electron Microscopy (Sem), Transmission Electron Microscopy (Tem) and Secondary Ion Mass Spectroscopy (Sims) Characterization of the Morphology of Aluminum Bond Pads for Surface Reflectivity Applications.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

M. Schade
Affiliation:
Chemical and Surface Analysis Laboratory, Communications, Power and Signal Technologies Group, Semiconductor Products Sector, Motorola Inc., 5005 East McDowell Road, Phoenix, Arizona 85008
R. Ai
Affiliation:
Chemical and Surface Analysis Laboratory, Communications, Power and Signal Technologies Group, Semiconductor Products Sector, Motorola Inc., 5005 East McDowell Road, Phoenix, Arizona 85008
Y. Stein
Affiliation:
Chemical and Surface Analysis Laboratory, Communications, Power and Signal Technologies Group, Semiconductor Products Sector, Motorola Inc., 5005 East McDowell Road, Phoenix, Arizona 85008
T. Anderson
Affiliation:
Chemical and Surface Analysis Laboratory, Communications, Power and Signal Technologies Group, Semiconductor Products Sector, Motorola Inc., 5005 East McDowell Road, Phoenix, Arizona 85008
Get access

Abstract

Extreme variations in surface reflectivity/topography have been observed on silicon wafers with evaporated aluminum metallization following thermal annealing processes. Such topographic variations negatively impacted the performance of wire bonder pattern recognition systems. It was proposed that this variation was attributed to differences in deposition rates during evaporation of the aluminum front metallization. SEM analysis revealed that the topographically rough sites, deemed as normal for this processing sequence, had large numbers of hillocks, while the smooth sites exhibited limited numbers of hillocks after heat treatment. SIMS depth profiling analyses did not indicate that any elemental difference existed between the smooth and the rough sites, although interfacial differences were detected. Specifically, the Al-Si interface for the rough surface was more graded in nature while the Al-Si interface for the smooth surface was more abrupt. TEM analysis of the rough sites revealed that a three-dimensional island growth mechanism prevailed during film growth, resulting in uneven surface development, whereas analysis of the smooth sites showed a columnar grain structure.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Reference Sources

1. Lau, S.S. and Weg, W.F.Van der, Thin Films - Interdiffusion and Reactions, edited by Poate, J. M., Tu, K.N. and Mayer, J.W., (Electrochemical Society), John Wiley and Sons, New York, New York, 1978, pp 100103.Google Scholar
2. Ibid, p 441.Google Scholar