Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T09:18:41.514Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Scanning Auger and Xps Studies of Fracture Surfaces of B4C Hot Pressed with Excess Carbon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

Benjamin M. DeKoven
Affiliation:
The Dow Chemical Company, Central Research, 1776 Building, Midland, MI 48674
Eric A. Ness
Affiliation:
The Dow Chemical Company, Central Research, 1776 Building, Midland, MI 48674
David D. Hawn
Affiliation:
The Dow Chemical Company, Michigan Applied Science and Technology Laboratory, 1897 Building, Midland, MI 48674
Get access

Abstract

A series of boron carbide materials was hot pressed with 0-7% excess carbon. The strength of each material was determined by four point bending, and found to decrease from about 600MPa to 300MPa as the carbon content increased from 0% to 7%. Diamond indentation yielded hardness values that decreased from 28.3 to 25.OGPa and toughness values that increased from 3.5 to 4.5 MPa√mover the same carbon range. Each sample was fractured in situ in ultrahigh vacuum (UHV) and examined by scanning Auger microanalysis (SAM) and XPS to determine both the elemental and chemical state distributions. For the samples with excess carbon, localized carbonrich regions are observed on fracture surfaces by SAM. XPS reveals a 50% enhancement of excess carbon on the fracture surface compared to the bulk for the sample with 7% excess carbon. A correlation was observed between surface carbon composition and the bulk toughness and hardness. The C(ls) XPS spectra were utilized to determine the nature of carbon in B4C on freshly fractured and Ne+ bombarded surfaces. Two distinct peaks were observed in the C(ls) region. Low dose ion bombardment resulted in a single broad C(ls) peak at the midpoint of the two initial peaks. It can be inferred from this data that there are C-C-C intericosahedral linkages in B4C.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Madden, H. H. and Wallace, W. O., Sur. Sci. 172, 641 (1986).Google Scholar
2. Madden, H. H. and Nelson, G. C., Phys. Rev. B 31, 3667 (1985).Google Scholar
3. Schwetz, K. A. and Grellner, W., J. Less Com. Metals 82, 37 (1981).Google Scholar
4. Ansitis, G.R., Chantikul, P., Lawn, B.R., and Marshall, D.B., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 64, 533 (1981).Google Scholar
5. Singh, J. P., Adv. Ceram. Mater. 3, 18 (1988).Google Scholar
6. Niihara, K., Nakahira, A., and Hirai, T., J. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 67, C13 (1984).Google Scholar
7. Hollenberg, G. W. and Walther, G., J. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 63, 610 (1980).Google Scholar
8. Cook, R. F. and Schrott, A. G., “Calcium Segregation to Grain Boundaries in Alumina”, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 71[1] 5058 (1988).Google Scholar
9. Witek, S. R., Miller, G. A., and Harmer, M. P., “Effects of CaO on the Strength and Toughness of AIN”, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 72[3] 469–73 (1989).Google Scholar
10. Anderson, H.H. and Bay, H.L., in Sputtering by Particle Bombardment I, edited by Behrisch, R. (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1981), pp. 145218.Google Scholar
11. DeKoven, B.M., Hagans, P.L., Leddy, J.J., and Kar, K.K., Sur. Coat. Tech. 36, 207 (1988).Google Scholar
12. Emin, D., Phys. Rev. B 38, 6041 (1988).Google Scholar