Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:33:46.648Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sb2Te3 and Bi2Te3 Thin Films Grown by Molecular Beam Epitaxy at Room Temperature

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 August 2011

Z. Aabdin ,
M. Winkler ,
D. Bessas ,
J. König ,
N. Peranio ,
O. Eibl ,
R. Hermann  and
H. Böttner
Z. Aabdin
Affiliation:
Institut für Angewandte Physik, Universität Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 10, D−72076 Tübingen, Germany
M. Winkler
Affiliation:
Fraunhofer Institut Physikalische Messtechnik, Heidenhofstrasse 8, D-79110 Freiburg, Germany
D. Bessas
Affiliation:
Institut für Festkörperforschung, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Leo Brandt Strasse 1, D−52425 Jülich, Germany
J. König
Affiliation:
Fraunhofer Institut Physikalische Messtechnik, Heidenhofstrasse 8, D-79110 Freiburg, Germany
N. Peranio
Affiliation:
Institut für Angewandte Physik, Universität Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 10, D−72076 Tübingen, Germany
O. Eibl
Affiliation:
Institut für Angewandte Physik, Universität Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 10, D−72076 Tübingen, Germany
R. Hermann
Affiliation:
Institut für Festkörperforschung, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Leo Brandt Strasse 1, D−52425 Jülich, Germany
H. Böttner
Affiliation:
Fraunhofer Institut Physikalische Messtechnik, Heidenhofstrasse 8, D-79110 Freiburg, Germany
Get access

Abstract

Nano-alloyed p-type Sb2Te3 and n-type Bi2Te3 thin films were grown on SiO2/Si and BaF2 substrates by molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) in two steps: (i) Repeated deposition of five-layer stacks with sequence Te-X-Te-X-Te (X = Sb or Bi) with elemental layer thicknesses of 0.2 nm on substrates at room temperature, (ii) annealing at 250 °C for two hours at which phase formation of Sb2Te3 or Bi2Te3 occurred. The room temperature MBE deposition method reduces surface roughness, allows the use of non lattice-matched substrates, and yields a more accurate and easier control of the Te content compared to Bi2Te3 thin films, which were epitaxially grown on BaF2 substrates at 290 °C. X-ray diffraction revealed that the thin films were single phase, poly-crystalline, and textured. The films showed grain sizes of 500 nm for Sb2Te3 and 250 nm for Bi2Te3, analyzed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The in-plane transport properties (thermopower S, electrical conductivity σ, charge carrier density n, charge carrier mobility μ, power factor S2σ) were measured at room temperature. The nano-alloyed Sb2Te3 thin film revealed a remarkably high power factor of 29 μW cm-1 K-2 similar to epitaxially grown Bi2Te3 thin films and Sb2Te3 single crystalline bulk materials. This large power factor can be attributed to a high charge carrier mobility of 402 cm2 V−1 s-1 similar to high-ZT Bi2Te3/Sb2Te3 superlattices. However, for the nano-alloyed Bi2Te3 thin film a low power factor of 8 μW cm−1 K-2 and a low charge carrier mobility of 80 cm2 V−1 s−1 were found. Detailed microstructure and phase analyses were carried out by energy-filtered TEM in cross-sections. Quantitative chemical analysis by energy-dispersive x−ray spectroscopy (EDS) was also applied. In Bi2Te3 thin films, few nanometer thick Bi-rich blocking layers at grain boundaries and Te fluctuations by 1.3 at.% within the grains were observed. The small charge carrier densities are explained by a reduced antisite defect density due to the low temperatures to which the thin films were exposed during annealing.

Keywords

thermoelectricitythin filmtransmission electron microscopy (TEM)
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1329: Symposium I – Nanoscale Heat Transfer–Thermoelectrics, Thermophotovoltaics and Emerging Thermal Devices , 2011 , mrss11-1329-i04-04
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Hicks, L.D. and Dresselhaus, M.S., Phys. Rev. B 47, 12727 (1993).Google Scholar
2. Venkatasubramanian, R., Siivola, E., Colpitts, T., and O’Quinn, B., Nature (London) 413, 597 (2001).Google Scholar
3. Peranio, N., Eibl, O., and Nurnus, J., J. Appl. Phys. 100, No. 114306 (2006).Google Scholar
4. Mzerd, A., Sayah, D., Brun, G., Tedenac, J.C., and Boyer, A., J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 14, 194 (1995).Google Scholar
5. Nakajima, S., J.Phys. Chem. Solids 24, 479 (1963).Google Scholar
6. König, J.D., Böttner, H., Tomforde, J., and Bensch, W., Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Thermoelectrics (ICT2007), Jeju Island, Korea, 2007, (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2007), pp. 390–393.Google Scholar
7. Winkler, M., Ebling, D., Böttner, H., Kirste, L., Proceedings of 8th European Conference on Thermoelectrics, Italy, 2010, p. 26.Google Scholar
8. König, J.D., Winkler, M., Buller, S., Bensch, W., Schürmann, U., Kienle, L., Böttner, H., to be published in Journal of Electronic Materials, Special Issue: International Conference on Thermoelectrics 2010, (2011).Google Scholar
9. Peranio, N. and Eibl, O., Phys. Status Solidi A 204, 3243 (2007).Google Scholar
10. Peranio, N. and Eibl, O., J. Appl. Phys. 103, No. 024314 (2008).Google Scholar
11. Peranio, N. et al. , (unpublished).Google Scholar
12. Stordeur, M., Stölzer, M., Sobotta, H., and Riede, V., Phys. Status Solidi B 150, 165 (1988).Google Scholar
13. Rowe, D.M., CRC Handbook of Thermoelectrics (CRC, Boca Raton, FL, 1995), chapter 19.Google Scholar
14. Miller, G.R. and Li, C.-Y., J. Phys. Chem. Solids 26, 173 (1965).Google Scholar
15. Horak, J., Cermak, K., and Koudelka, L., J. Phys. Chem. Solids 47, 805 (1986).Google Scholar