Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T16:14:57.313Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rotating Anisotropies Without Superparamagnetic Grains in Exchange Bias Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

T. C. Schulthess
T. C. Schulthess*
Affiliation:
Center for Computational Sciences and Computer Science and Mathematics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831–6114, U. S. A.
Get access

Abstract

We introduce a random field model with anisotropic interfacial exchange for ferromagnet / antiferromagnet bilayers and calculate average coupling energies and coupling directions for different grain or domain sizes. The model is shown to reconcile Malozemoff's random field Ising model for exchange bias with the spinflop coupling mechanism. Furthermore, we find that for small and mid size domains, the average coupling direction strongly varies between different interfacial configurations. We show how this behavior can lead to rotating anisotropies in systems with very strong magnetocrystalline anisotropies, where the use of superparamagnetic grains or domains in the antiferrofmagnet is not justified.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 746: Symposia Q/R – Magnetoelectronics-Novel Magnetic Phenomena in Nanostructures – Advanced Characterization of Artificially Structured Magnetic Materials , 2002 , Q7.7
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERECES

1. Meiklejohn, W.H. and Bean, C.P., A new magnetic anisotropy. Physical Review B, 1956. 102: p. 1413.Google Scholar
2. Nogues, J. and Schuller, I.K., Exchange bias. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 1999. 192(2): p. 203–232.Google Scholar
3. Berkowitz, A.E. and Takano, K., Exchange anisotropy - a review. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 1999. 200(1–3): p. 552–570.Google Scholar
4. Stiles, M.D. and McMichael, R.D., Coercivity in exchange-bias bilayers. Physical Review B, 2001. 6305(6): p. art. no.-064405.Google Scholar
5. Li, Z. and Zhang, S., Coercive mechanisms in ferromagntic-antiferromagnetic bilayers. Physical Review B, 2000. 61(22): p. R14897–R14900.Google Scholar
6. Leighton, C., et al., Thickness-dependent coercive mechanisms in exchange-biased bilayers. Physical Review B, 2002. 65(6): p. art. no.-064403.Google Scholar
7. Fulcomer, E. and Charap, S.H., Thermal Fluctuation Aftereffect Model for Some Systems with Ferromagnetic-Antiferromagnetic Coupling. Journal of Applied Physics, 1972. 43(10): p. 4190&.Google Scholar
8. Stiles, M.D. and McMichael, R.D., Model for exchange bias in polycrystalline ferromagnet-antiferromagnet bilayers. Physical Review B, 1999. 59(5): p. 3722–3733.Google Scholar
9. Wagner, V. and Hermann-Ronzaud, D., Neutron Inelastic Scattering 1977. IAEA, Vienna 1977, 1977. Part II: p. 135–143.Google Scholar
10. Here we will discuss uniaxial AFMs that consist of two ferromagnetic sublattices with anti-aligned moments and we assume nearest neighbor exchange between AFM and FM spins at the interface with exchange parameter JGoogle Scholar
11. Kiwi, M., Exchange bias theory. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 2001. 234(3): p. 584–595.Google Scholar
12. Stamps, R.L., Mechanisms for exchange bias. Journal of Physics D-Applied Physics, 2000. 33(23): p. R247–R268.Google Scholar
13. Malozemoff, A.P., Random-Field Model of Exchange-Anisotropy at Rough Ferromagnetic-Antiferromagnetic Interfaces. Physical Review B, 1987. 35(7): p. 3679–3682.Google Scholar
14. Malozemoff, A.P., Mechanisms of Exchange-Anisotropy. Journal of Applied Physics, 1988. 63(8): p. 3874–3879.Google Scholar
15. Nowak, U., et al., Domain state model for exchange bias. I. Theory. Physical Review B, 2002. 66(1): p. art. no.-014430.Google Scholar
16. Koon, N.C., Calculations of exchange bias in thin films with ferromagnetic/antiferromagnetic interfaces. Physical Review Letters, 1997. 78(25): p. 4865–4868.Google Scholar
17. Hinchey, L.L. and Mills, D.L., Magnetic-Properties of Ferromagnet-Antiferromagnet Superlattice Structures with Mixed-Spin Antiferromagnetic Sheets. Physical Review B, 1986. 34(3): p. 1689–1699.Google Scholar
18. Schulthess, T.C. and Butler, W.H., Consequences of spin-flop coupling in exchange biased films. Physical Review Letters, 1998. 81(20): p. 4516–4519.Google Scholar
19. Schulthess, T.C. and Butler, W.H., Coupling mechanisms in exchange biased films (invited). Journal of Applied Physics, 1999. 85(8): p. 5510–5515.Google Scholar
20. Dzyaloshinsky, I., A thermodynamic theory of “weak” ferromagnetism of antiferromagnetics. J. Phys. Chem. Solids, 1958. 4: p. 241–255.Google Scholar
21. Moriya, T., Anisotropic Superexchange Interaction and Weak Ferromagnetism. Physical Review, 1958. 120(1): p. 91–98.Google Scholar
22. Crepieux, A. and Lacroix, C., Dzyaloshinsky-Moriya interactions induced by symmetry breaking at a surface. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 1998. 182(3): p. 341–349.Google Scholar
23. Katsnelson, M.I., Dobrovitski, V.V., and Harmon, B.N., Many-spin model and the spin Hamiltonian of Mn-12 clusters. Journal of Applied Physics, 1999. 85(8): p. 4533–4535.Google Scholar