Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T01:59:06.714Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Room-temperature Photoluminescence at 1540 nm from Amorphous Silicon Carbide Films Implanted with Erbium

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2011

Spyros Gallis ,
Harry Efstathiadis ,
Mengbing Huang ,
Alain E. Kaloyeros ,
Ei Ei Nyein  and
Uwe Hommerich
Spyros Gallis
Affiliation:
School of NanoSciences and NanoEngineering, The University at Albany-SUNY, Albany, New York 12203
Harry Efstathiadis
Affiliation:
School of NanoSciences and NanoEngineering, The University at Albany-SUNY, Albany, New York 12203
Mengbing Huang
Affiliation:
School of NanoSciences and NanoEngineering, The University at Albany-SUNY, Albany, New York 12203
Alain E. Kaloyeros
Affiliation:
School of NanoSciences and NanoEngineering, The University at Albany-SUNY, Albany, New York 12203
Ei Ei Nyein
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Hampton University, Hampton, VA 23668
Uwe Hommerich
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Hampton University, Hampton, VA 23668
Get access

Abstract

In the present work, strong room-temperature photoluminescence (PL) at 1540 nm is reported from erbium-implanted and post-annealed amorphous silicon carbide (a-SiC:Er) films. The stoichiometric SiC films were grown by thermal chemical vapor deposition (TCVD) at 800°C, and then implanted to Er fluence of 3×1015 ions/cm2 using 380 keV implantation energy. Post-implantation annealing was carried out at the temperature range of 550°C to 1350°C in argon (Ar) ambient. The resulting SiC films were characterized by Auger electron spectroscopy (AES), Rutherford backscattering (RBS), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), nuclear reaction analysis (NRA), x-ray diffraction (XRD), and high-resolution transmission electron microscope (HRTEM). Clear PL behavior was seen from the annealed a-SiC:Er samples, even at room temperature, with PL intensity reaching a maximum for samples annealed at 900°C.

Additional studies of thermal quenching of Er luminescence from a-SiC:Er samples annealed at 900°C indicated that as the sample temperature increased from 14K to room temperature, the luminescence intensity at 1540 nm dropped by a factor of ∼ 3.6. Moreover, the PL spectra of the a-SiC:Er samples did not exhibit any defect-generated luminescence. It is suggested that the lower density of Si and C vacancies in the stoichiometric a-SiC:Er, as compared to its non-stoichiometric a-Si1-xCx counterpart, along with the incorporation of a higher Er dopant concentration, can effectively diminish defect-produced luminescence and lead to a significant improvement in PL performance.

These properties suggest that stoichiometric a-SiC:Er may be a good candidate for producing optoelectronic devices operating in the 1540 nm region.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 815 , 2004 , J5.29
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Polman, A., J. Appl. Phys. 82, 1 (1997).Google Scholar
2. Coffa, S., Franzò, G. and Priolo, F., MRS Bulletin 23, 25 (1998).Google Scholar
3. Favennec, P. N., L'Haridon, H., Salvi, M., Moutonnet, D. and Guillon, Y. Le, Electron. Lett. 25, 718 (1989).Google Scholar
4. Rare Earth Doped Semiconductors II, edited by Coffa, S., Polman, A. and Schwartz, R. N., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 442 (1996) (MRS, Pittsburgh).Google Scholar
5. Zanatta, A. R., Appl. Phys. Lett. 82, 1395 (2003).Google Scholar
6. Terukov, E. I., Kudoyarova, V. Kh., Kuznetsov, A. N., Fuhs, W., Weiser, G. and Küehne, H., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 227–230, 488 (1998).Google Scholar
7. Küehne, H., Weiser, G., Terukov, E. I., Kuznetsov, A. N. and Kudoyarova, V. Kh., J. Appl. Phys. 86, 896 (1999).Google Scholar
8. Biersack, J. P. and Haggmark, L. G., Nucl. Instrum. Methods 174, 257 (1980).Google Scholar
9. Awahara, K., Uekusa, S., Goto, T., Kobayashi, T. and Kumagai, M., Nucl. Instr. & Methods Phys. Res. B 148, 507 (1999).Google Scholar
10. Foti, G., Appl. Surf. Sci. 184, 20 (2001).Google Scholar
11. Przybylinska, H., Jantsch, W., Suprun-Belevitch, Y., Stepikhova, M., Palmetshofer, L., Hendorfer, G., Kozanecki, A., Wilson, R. J. and Sealy, B. J., Phys. Rev. B 54, 2532 (1996).Google Scholar
12. Huang, M. B. and Ren, X. T., Phys. Rev. B 68, 33203 (2003).Google Scholar
13. Choyke, W. J., Devaty, R. P., Clemen, L. L., Yoganathan, M., Pensl, G. and Hässler, Ch., Appl. Phys. Lett. 65, 1668 (1994).Google Scholar