Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T16:11:37.397Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Role of Surface Layers in the Leaching Behavior of Glass

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

B.K. Zoitos  and
D.E. Clark
B.K. Zoitos
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611
D.E. Clark
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611
Get access

Abstract

Results are presented from a two-year dynamic leach test of nuclear waste glass under conditions designed to simulate those of the Stripa granite repository. Solution and surface analytical techniques were used to assess the glass leach rate as well as surface composition and morphology. Glass leach rates were observed to decrease by a factor of two during the first six months. This effect is attributed to the formation of a protective surface layer. Analysis of this layer shows it to be rich in silicon and iron and depleted in lithium, sodium and boron. It was also found that the layer is subject to dissolution.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 125: Symposium N – Materials Stability and Environmental Degradation , 1988 , 169
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Clark, D.E., Zhu, B.F., Robinson, R.S. and Wicks, G.G., in Advances in Ceramics, Vol.8: Nuclear Waste Management, edited by Wicks, G.G. and Ross, W.A. (The American Ceramic Society, Westerville, OH, 1983), pp. 324–336.Google Scholar
2. Iseghem, P. Van, Timmermans, W., Debruyn, W., Dresselaers, J., and Neerdael, B., in Advances in Ceramics, Vol.20: Nuclear Waste Management II, edited by Clark, D.E., White, W.B., and Machiels, A.J. (The American Ceramic Society, Westerville, OH, 1986) pp. 649–656.Google Scholar
3. Wicks, G.G. and Molecke, M.A., in Advances in Ceramics, Vol.20: Nuclear Waste Management II, edited by Clark, D.E., White, W.B., and Machiels, A.J. (The American Ceramic Society, Westerville, OH, 1986) pp. 657–667.Google Scholar
4. DOE/TIC-11400 Nuclear Waste Materials Handbook-Test Methods, (Pacific Northwest Laboratories, Richland, WA, 1981)Google Scholar
5. Adiga, R.B., Akomer, E.P., and Clark, D.E., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management VIII, edited by Jantzen, C.M., Stone, J.A., and Ewing, R.C. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 44, Pittsburgh, PA 1985) pp. 45–54.Google Scholar
6. Savitsky, A. and Golay, M.J.E., Anal. Chem. 36, 1627 (1964).Google Scholar
7. Gans, P. and Gill, J.B., Appl. Spectrosc. 37 [6], 515 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Lodding, A.R., Engstrom, E.U., Clark, D.E., Werme, L.O., and Wicks, G.G. in Advances in Ceramics, Vol. 20: Nuclear Waste Management II, edited by Clark, D.E., White, W.B., and Machiels, A.J., (The American Ceramic Society, Westerville, OH, 1986) pp. 567–581.Google Scholar
9. Jantzen, C.M. and Bibler, N.E., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management IX, edited by Werme, L.O. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 50, Pittsburgh, PA 1986) pp. 219–230.Google Scholar