Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:29:50.541Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Role of Coupling Agents in Composite Durability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

K. S. Macturk ,
C. L. Schutte ,
C. R. Schultheisz ,
D. L. Hunston  and
M. J. Tarlov
K. S. Macturk
Affiliation:
National Research Council Research Associate
C. L. Schutte
Affiliation:
Polymers Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899
C. R. Schultheisz
Affiliation:
Polymers Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899
D. L. Hunston
Affiliation:
Polymers Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899
M. J. Tarlov
Affiliation:
Process Measurements Division
Get access

Abstract

We investigated the role of coupling agents with respect to the relative durability of glass fiber/epoxy matrix composites exposed to water, which degrades both glass fibers and the fiber-matrix interface. Interface chemistry was tailored by coating fibers with mixtures of different coupling agents. Single-fiber fragmentation test results showed little decrease in the strengths of the interface and a slight decrease in fiber strengths upon exposure to water. XPS results showed expected variations in surface composition. Contact angle measurements demonstrated variations in surface hydrophobicity as coupling agent mixtures were changed.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 385: Symposium N – Polymer/Inorganic Interfaces II , 1995 , 131
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Lesko, J.J., Swain, R.E., Cartwright, J.M., Chin, J.W., Reifsnider, K.L., Dillard, D.A., Wightman, J.P., J. Adhesion 45, 43 (1994).Google Scholar
2. Mader, E., Grundke, K., Jacobasch, H.-J., Wachinger, G., Composites 25, 739 (1994).Google Scholar
3. Serrano, A.M., Jangchud, I., Eby, R.K., Bowles, K.J., Jayne, D.T., Mat. Res. Soc. Proc. 305, 105 (1993).Google Scholar
4. Kelly, A., Tyson, W.R., J. Mech. Phys. Solids 13, 329 (1965).Google Scholar
5. Rao, V., Drzal, L.T., Polymer Composites 12, 48 (1991).Google Scholar
6. Fowlkes, M.J., Wong, W.K., Polymer 28, 1309 (1987).Google Scholar
7. Drzal, L.T., Rich, M.J., Koenig, M.F., J. Adhesion 18, 49 (1985).Google Scholar
8. DiBenedetto, A.T., Lex, P.J., Polym. Eng. and Sci. 29, 543 (1989).Google Scholar
9. Bian, X.S., Ambrosio, L., Kenny, J.M., Nicholais, L., DiBenedetto, A.T., Polymer Composites 12, 333 (1991).Google Scholar
10. Charles, R.J., J. Appl. Phys. 29, 1549 (1958); J. Appl. Phys. 29, 1554 (1958).Google Scholar
11. Konkin, A.A., in Handbook of Composites, Vol.1:Strong Fibers edited by Watt, W. and Perov, B.V. (Elsevier Science, New York, 1985), p. 255.Google Scholar
12. Wagner, H.D., Eitan, A., Appl. Phys. Letters 56, 1965 (1990); see also B. Yavin, H.E. Gallis, J. Scherf, A. Eitan, H.D. Wagner, Polymer Composites 12, 436 (1991).Google Scholar
13. Drzal, L.T., Rich, M.J., Camping, J.D., Park, W.D., in Proc. of 35th Ann. Tech. Conf., Reinforced Plastics, (Composites Institute, 1980), p.1.Google Scholar
14. Schutte, C.L., McDonough, W., Shioya, M., McAuliffe, M., Greenwood, M., Composites 25, 617 (1994).Google Scholar