Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T02:22:21.738Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Role of Cluster Formation on the Magnetic Properties of Nd-Fe-Al-based Magnetic Alloys

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2011

I. Betancourt
Affiliation:
Institute for Materials Research, UNAM. P.O. Box 70–360, Mexico DF 04510, Mexico
R. Valenzuela
Affiliation:
Institute for Materials Research, UNAM. P.O. Box 70–360, Mexico DF 04510, Mexico
Get access

Abstract

We present a detailed investigation of the role of the disorder degree on magnetic properties for melt spun and die cast intermetallic Nd-Fe-Al-based alloys. For melt spun alloys, the roll speed was varied between 30 m/s and 5 m/s, which resulted in a clear dependence of coercivity on increasing roll speed, showing a steep decrease (from 250 kA/m to 10 kA/m). The results are interpreted in terms of a gradual transition from fully disordered microstructure (30 m/s sample) to short range ordered one (i.e., a clustered microstructure at 5 m/s), which is a consequence of a diminished cooling rate. On the other hand, die-cast alloy affords cluster formation due to this very low cooling rate compared with the melt spinning process and in consequence, coercivity values of 284 kA/m were observed. Further alloying addition (B, Cu, Dy) on the original Nd-Fe-Al composition, exhibited coercivity enhancement (up to 388 kA/m) due to the presence of small Nd-based crystallites, which act as pinning centers.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Valenzuela, R.Magnetic Ceramics”, Cambridge University Press, 1994. Chapter 4.Google Scholar
2. Inoue, A., Takeuchi, A. and Zhang, T., Metal. Mater. Trans. A 29, 1779 (1998)Google Scholar
3. McCallum, R.W., Kramer, M.J., Dennis, K.W., and Lewis, L.H. in 17th Int. Work. RE Magn & Appl, edited by Hadjipanayis, G.C. and Bonder, M.J. (Rinton Press, Newark, DE, 2002) pp. 176 Google Scholar
4. Kong, H.Z., Li, Y., and Ding, J., J. Mag. Mag. Mater. 217, 65 (2000)Google Scholar
5. Sato Turtelli, R., Triyono, D., Grossinger, R., Michor, H., Espina, J.H., Sinnecker, J.P., Sassik, H., Eckert, J., Kumar, G., Sun, Z.G. and Fan, G.J., Phys. Rev. B 66, 054441 (2002)Google Scholar
6. Wecker, J. and Shultz, L., J. Appl. Phys. 62, 990 (1987)Google Scholar
7. Coehoorn, R. and Duchateau, J., Mater. Sci. Eng. 99, 131 (1988)Google Scholar
8. Nagayama, K., Ino, H., Saito, N., Nakagawa, Y. and Siratori, K., J. Phys. Soc. Jap. 59, 2483 (1990)Google Scholar