Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T06:49:51.832Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Rheology Optimization of Particle Modified Consolidants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

Eleni Aggelakopoulou
Affiliation:
Princeton University, Eng. Quad. E-319, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA
Pamela Charles
Affiliation:
Princeton University, Eng. Quad. E-319, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA
Matilde E. Acerra
Affiliation:
Princeton University, Eng. Quad. E-319, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA
Ana I. Garcia
Affiliation:
Princeton University, Eng. Quad. E-319, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA
Robert J. Flatt
Affiliation:
Princeton University, Eng. Quad. E-319, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA
George W. Scherer
Affiliation:
Princeton University, Eng. Quad. E-319, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA
Get access

Abstract

Ethyl silicate-based consolidants are used to restore strength to degraded stones. One of the limitations of strength development using these products is their reported cracking behavior during drying. Particle Modified Consolidants (PMC) consist of a silicate matrix plus colloidal oxide particles. The presence of particles physically limits the silicate network from shrinking under capillary pressures, and thereby reduces strength loss during drying. In addition, the network maintains a higher permeability, because the dried consolidants remains porous. When the particles used are pigments, it is also conceivable to adjust the consolidant color. Moreover, a careful choice of particles should allow matching the thermal dilatation of the consolidant to that of the stone. An important limitation to further development of PMC has been the ability to avoid particle agglomeration in the dispersion. When agglomerates are present, not only do they increase the viscosity but they also can block pore entrances, preventing consolidant fromentering the stone. In this work we demonstrate the feasibility of adsorbing nano-silica particlesonto pigment particles to create a steric barrier to agglomeration. Rheology and density measurements confirm that the resulting dispersion is fluid and stable against settling. The consolidant readily penetrates Ohio Massilian sandstone, providing improved strength, stiffness, and salt resistance, compared to a commercial silicate consolidant.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.PROSOCO, 755 Minnesota Ave., P.O. Box 171677, Kansas City, KS 66117 USAGoogle Scholar
2. Félix, C., Peut-on consolider les grès tendres du Plateau suisse avec le silicate d'éthyle? (Can one consolidate the soft sandstones of the Swiss plateau with ethyl silicate?)”, pp. 267274 in Preservation and restoration of cultural heritage, ed. Pancella, R. Proc. LCP Congress, Montreux, 1995 Google Scholar
3. Yang, M. Scherer, G.W. and Wheeler, G.S. pp. 201208 in Compatible Materials for the Protection of European Cultural Heritage, eds. Biscontin, G. Moropoulou, A. Erdik, M. Rodrigues, J. Delgado, PACT 56 (Tech. Chamber Greece, Athens, 1998)Google Scholar
4. Escalante, M.R. Valenza, J. and Scherer, G.W. pp. 459465 in Proc. 9th Int. Cong. Deterioration and Conservation of Stone, Vol. 2, ed. Fassina, V. (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2000)Google Scholar
5. Escalante, M.R. Flatt, R. Scherer, G.W. Tsiourva, D. and Moropoulou, A.Particle-modified Consolidants”, Proc. Int. Symp. Conserv. Monuments Med. Basin V (2000), to be publishedGoogle Scholar
6. Grissom, C.A. and Weiss, N.R. Art and Archaeology Technical Abstracts 18 [1] (1981) 150202 Google Scholar
7. Tsui, N. Flatt, R.J. and Scherer, G.W. “Crystallization damage by sodium sulfate”, to bepublishedGoogle Scholar