Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:11:55.171Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Resistivity as a Tool for Characterizing Point Defects in Nonstoichiometric Metallic Ceramics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Wendell S. Williams*
Affiliation:
Physics Department, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801
Get access

Abstract

Compounds of IVb and Vb transition metals and carbon are electronically conductive, hard materials that crystallize in the NaC1 structure but are very nonstoichiometric (carbon-poor), as in TiCx, where x is the carbon/metal ratio and is less than unity. Carbon atom vacancies are randomly located in the fcc carbon sublattice and act as scattering centers for conduction electrons. Data on the electrical resistivity as a function of the concentration of these point defects could be used in the opposite sense–i.e., to determine the defect concentration, (l-x), through a measurement of resistivity. The chemical composition (carbon/metal ratio) is then given directly by x. The random vacancies can be ordered by slow cooling from high temperatures, thereby eliminating the residual resistivity. The carbon/metal ratios of these ordered phases are either 3:4, 5:6 or 7:8 and thus can specify the chemical composition precisely.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Williams, W. S., in Progress in Solid State Chemistry 6, edited by McCaldin, J. O. and Reiss, H. (Pergamon Press, Oxford and New York, 1971) pp. 57118. Also Mat. Sci. and Eng. A 105/106, 1–10 (1988).Google Scholar
2. Gerk, A. P. and Gilnan, J. J., J. Appl. Phys. 39, 4497 (1958).Google Scholar
3. Dy, L. C. and Williams, W. S., J. Appl. Phys. 53, 89158927 (1982).Google Scholar
4. Williams, W. S., Phys. Rev. 135, A505–A510 (1964).Google Scholar
5. Santoro, G. and Dolloff, R. T., J. Appl. Phys. 39, 2293 (1968).Google Scholar
6. Sarian, S., J. Appl. Phys. 39, 3305 (1968).Google Scholar
7. Shacklette, L. W. and Williams, W. S., J. Appl. Phys. 42, 46984703 (1971); Phys. Rev. B 7, 5041–5053 (1973).Google Scholar
8. Emmons, G., Ph.D. Thesis, University of Illinois, 1972. See also W. S. Williams, High Temp. and High Pressures 4, 627–638 (1972).Google Scholar