Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:19:14.357Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Resist Materials Providing Small Line-Edge Roughness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Hideo Namatsu
Affiliation:
NTT Basic Research Laboratories, 3–1 Morinosato Wakamiya, Atsugi, Kanagawa, 243–0198, JAPAN
Toru Yamaguchi
Affiliation:
NTT Basic Research Laboratories, 3–1 Morinosato Wakamiya, Atsugi, Kanagawa, 243–0198, JAPAN
Kenji Kurihara
Affiliation:
NTT Basic Research Laboratories, 3–1 Morinosato Wakamiya, Atsugi, Kanagawa, 243–0198, JAPAN
Get access

Abstract

Our research focuses on the line-edge roughness of resist patterns and how to reduce it in order to establish nanolithography as a practical tool. Commercially available e-beam resists exhibit a line-edge roughness of 3 nm (σ) or more. It is caused mainly by polymer aggregates in the resist. During development, they are extracted through dissolution of the surrounding polymer matrix. That is, the aggregates themselves dissolve more slowly than the surrounding matrix; and those that remain embedded in the resist produce line-edge roughness. To reduce the roughness, the effect of the aggregates must be suppressed. One way of doing this is to use a resist containing small aggregates. A good candidate is hydrogen silsesquioxane, which has a three-dimensional framework. Another way is to use a resist in which the aggregates are linked together, which makes them difficult to extract during development. A good example is an acrylate-type resist with a cross-linker mixed in.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Yamaguchi, T., Namatsu, H., Nagase, M., Yamazaki, K., and Kurihara, K., Appl. Phys. Let. 71, 2388 (1997).Google Scholar
2.Namatsu, H., Takahashi, Y., Yamazaki, K., Yamaguchi, T., Nagase, M., and Kurihara, K., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 16, 69 (1998).Google Scholar
3.Namatsu, H., Nagase, M., Yamaguchi, T., Yamazaki, K., and Kurihara, K., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 16, 3315 (1998).Google Scholar
4.Yamaguchi, T., Namatsu, H., Nagase, M., Kurihara, K., and Kawai, Y., Proceedings of SPIE 24th Annual International Symposium on Microlithography, SantaClara, California, 1999, p. 617.Google Scholar
5.Yamaguchi, T., Namatsu, H., Yamazaki, K., Nagase, M., and Kurihara, K., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., to be published.Google Scholar
6.Namatsu, H., Nagase, M., Kurihara, K., Iwadate, K., Furuta, T., and Murase, K., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 13, 1473 (1995).Google Scholar
7.Nagase, M., Namatsu, H., Kurihara, K., Iwadate, K., Murase, K., and Makino, T., Microelectron. Eng. 30, 419 (1996).Google Scholar
8.Yamaguchi, T., Namatsu, H., Nagase, M., Yamazaki, K., and Kurihara, K., Proceedings of SPIE 23rd Annual International Symposium on Microlithography, Santa Clara, California, 1998, p. 830.Google Scholar
9.Frye, C. L. and Collins, W. T., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 92, 5586 (1970).Google Scholar
10.Fujita, J., Ohnishi, Y., Ochiai, Y., Nomura, E. and Matsui, S., J. Vac. Sci, Technol. B14, 4272 (1996).Google Scholar