Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:53:52.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Residual Stress and Microstructure of Electroplated Cu Film on Different Barrier Layers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

Alex A. Volinsky ,
Meike Hauschildt ,
Joseph B. Vella ,
N.V. Edwards ,
Rich Gregory  and
William W. Gerberich
Alex A. Volinsky
Affiliation:
Motorola DigitalDNATM Labs, Process and Materials Characterization Lab, Mesa, AZ
Meike Hauschildt
Affiliation:
University of Texas, Materials Science Lab for Interconnect and Packaging, Austin, TX
Joseph B. Vella
Affiliation:
Motorola DigitalDNATM Labs, Process and Materials Characterization Lab, Mesa, AZ
N.V. Edwards
Affiliation:
Motorola DigitalDNATM Labs, Process and Materials Characterization Lab, Mesa, AZ
Rich Gregory
Affiliation:
Motorola DigitalDNATM Labs, Process and Materials Characterization Lab, Mesa, AZ
William W. Gerberich
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota, Dept. of Chem. Eng. and Materials Science, Minneapolis, MN
Get access

Abstract

Copper films of different thicknesses between 0.2 and 2 microns were electroplated on adhesion-promoting TiW and Ta barrier layers on <100> single crystal 6-inch silicon wafers. The residual stress was measured after each processing step using a wafer curvature technique employing Stoney's equation. Large gradients in the stress distributions were found across each wafer. Controlled Cu grain growth was achieved by annealing films at 350 C for 3 minutes in high vacuum. Annealing increased the average tensile residual stress by about 200 MPa for all the films, which is in agreement with stress-temperature cycling measurements.

After aging for 1 year wafer stress mapping showed that the stress gradients in the copper films were alleviated. No stress discrepancies between the copper on Ta and TiW barrier layers could be found. However, X-ray pole figure analysis showed broad and shifted (111) texture in films on a TiW underlayer, whereas the (111) texture in Cu films on Ta is sharp and centered.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 695: Symposium L – Thin Films: Stresses and Mechanical Properties IX , 2001 , L1.11.1
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Nix, W.D., Metall. Trans. A, 20A, pp. 2217–2245, (1989)Google Scholar
2. Wei, Y. and Hutchinson, J.W., J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 45 (7), pp. 1137–1159, (1997)Google Scholar
3. Brown, D.D., Borgesen, P., Lilienfeld, D.A., Korhonen, M.A. and Li, C.Y., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. Vol. 239, pp. 701–706, (1993)Google Scholar
4. Toyoda, H., Wang, P.-H., Ho, P. S., in Proceedings of the International Reliability Physics Symposium in 1998, (IEEE, Piscataway, 1998), pp. 324–328.Google Scholar
5. Zschech, E., Blum, W., Zienert, I, Besser, P. R., Z Metallkd. 92, pp. 803–809, (2001)Google Scholar
6. Rosenberg, R., Edelstein, D. C., Hu, C.-K., Rodbell, K. P., Annual Review of Materials Sciences, (2000)Google Scholar
7. Ueno, K., Ritzdorf, T., Grace, S., J. Appl. Phys. 86 (9), pp. 4930–4935, (1999)Google Scholar
8. Brongersma, S. H., Richard, E., Vervoort, I., Bender, H., Vandervorst, W., Lagrange, S., Beyer, G., Maex, K., J. Appl. Phys. 86 (7), pp. 3642–3645, (1999)Google Scholar
9. Hauschildt, M., M.S. thesis, The University of Texas at Austin, (1999)Google Scholar
10.Frontier Semiconductor Measurements Inc., FSM 128&128L Operation Manual Rev. 4/98Google Scholar
11. Doerner, M. and Nix, W., J. Mater. Res. 1, p. 601, (1986)Google Scholar
12. Pharr, G.M., Oliver, W.C., Brotzen, F., J. Mater. Res., 7 (3), pp. 613–617, (1992)Google Scholar
13. Oliver, W.C. and Pharr, G.M., J. Mater. Res., 7, pp.1564–1583, (1992)Google Scholar
14. Volinsky, A.A., Vella, J., Adhihetty, I.S., Sarihan, V., Mercado, L., Yeung, B.H., Gerberich, W.W., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. Vol. 649, (2000)Google Scholar
15. Vinci, R.P., Zielinski, E.M., Bravman, J.C., Thin Solid Films 262, pp. 142–153, (1995)Google Scholar
16. Gottstein, G., Acta Metall. 32 (7), 1117–1138, (1984)Google Scholar
17. Hauschildt, M., Ogawa, E. T., Rhee, S.-H., Gan, D., Ho, P. S., to be published in Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., (2001)Google Scholar
18. Tracy, D. P., Knorr, D. B., Rodbell, K. P., J. Appl. Phys. 76 (5), (1994) pp. 2671–2680 Google Scholar
19. Zielinski, E. M, Ph. D. thesis, Stanford University, (1995)Google Scholar