Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T03:47:14.825Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Residual Stress Analysis with Neutrons

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

Aaron D. Krawitz
Aaron D. Krawitz*
Affiliation:
Dept. of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211
Get access

Abstract

The use of neutrons for the measurement of stress is complementary to and extends traditional x-ray diffraction methods to new types of problems. This is due to the lower absorption of neutrons compared to x-rays by most engineering materials, which increases the sampling depth from microns to millimeters. It is particularly suitable for triaxial macrostress gradients through the depth of engineering components and volumetric microstresses in composites. In addition, applied stress studies may also be performed. This paper briefly describes the nature of residual stresses, the use of diffraction for stress measurements, experimental aspects of the use of neutrons, and illustrative applications.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 166: Symposium J – Neutron Scattering for Materials Science , 1989 , 281
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Noyan, I. C. and Cohen, J. B., Residual Stress, Springer Verlag, New York, 1987.Google Scholar
2. Bacon, G. E., Neutron Diffraction, 3rd ed., Oxford Univ. Press, 1975.Google Scholar
3. Cullity, B. D., Elements of X-Ray Diffraction, 2nd ed., Addison-Wesley, 1978.Google Scholar
4. Schmank, M. J. and Krawitz, A. D., Metall. Trans., 13(1982)1069–1076.Google Scholar
5. Pintschovius, L., Jung, V., Macherauch, E. and Vohringer, O., Matls. Sci. and Engrg., 61(1983)43–50.Google Scholar
6. Prask, H. J. and Choi, C. S., J. Nuc. Matls., 136(1984)124–131.Google Scholar
7. Holden, T. M., Powell, B. M., Dolling, G. and MacEwen, S. R., Proc. 5th Riso Intl. Symp. on Metallurgy and Matls. Sci., 1984, pp. 291–294.Google Scholar
8. Holt, R. A., Dolling, G., Powell, B. M., Holden, T. M. and Winegar, J. E., Proc. 5th Riso Intl. Symp. on Metallurgy and Matls. Sci., 1984, pp. 295–300.Google Scholar
9. Allen, A. J., Hutchings, M. T., Windsor, C. G., and Andreani, C., Adv. in Phys., 34(1985)445–473.Google Scholar
10. Pintschovius, L., Macherauch, E. and Scholtes, B., Matls. Sci. and Engrg., 84(1986) 163–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Allen, A. J., Hutchings, M. T. and Rainey, V. S., Non-Destructive Testing, Proc. 4th European Conf., Pergamon Press, 1987, pp. 1808–1817.Google Scholar
12. Smith, D. J., Leggatt, R. H., Webster, G. A., MacGillivray, H. J., Webster, P. J. and Mills, G., J. Strain Analysis, 23(1988)201–211.Google Scholar
13. MacEwen, S. R., Faber, J. and Turner, A. P. L., Acta Metall., 31(1983)657–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Krawitz, A. D., Roberts, R. and Faber, J., Science of Hard Materials, Inst. of Physics Conf. Series No. 1, 75, 1986, pp. 577–589.Google Scholar
15. Krawitz, A. D., Reichel, D. G. and Hitterman, R. L., Matls. Sci. and Engrg., A112(1989), in press.Google Scholar
16. Majumdar, S., Kupperman, D. and Singh, J., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 71(1988)858–863.Google Scholar
17. Majumdar, S. and Kupperman, D., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 72(1989)312–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Krawitz, A. D., Crapenhoft, M. L., Reichel, D. G. and Warren, R., Matls. Sci. and Engrg., A105/106 (1988) 275–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Allen, A. J., Bourke, M., Hutchings, M. T., Krawitz, A. D. and Windsor, C. G., Residual Stresses in Sci. and Tech., Eds. Macherauch, E. and Hauk, V., DGM Verlag, Vol. 1, 1987, p. 151.Google Scholar
20. Rudnik, P. J., Krawitz, A. D., Reichel, D. G. and Cohen, J. B., Adv. in X-Ray Anal., Vol. 311, Plenum, 1988, pp. 245–253.Google Scholar
21. Butler, B. D., Murray, B. C., Reichel, D. G. and Krawitz, A. D., Adv. in X-Ray Anal., Vol. 32, Plenum Press, 1989, pp. 389–395.Google Scholar
22. Cohen, J. B., Powder Diffraction, 1(1986)15–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Predecki, P., Abuhasan, A. and Barrett, C. S., Adv. in X-Ray Anal., Vol. 31, Plenum, 1988, pp. 231–243.Google Scholar
24. Krawitz, A. D., Butler, B., Rudnik, P. and Cohen, J. B., Adv. in X-Ray Anal., Vol. 29, Plenum, 1986, pp. 163–172.Google Scholar
25. Faber, J. and Hitterman, R. L., Adv. in X-Ray Anal., Vol. 29, Plenum, 1986, pp. 119–130.Google Scholar
26. Krawitz, A. D. and Arsenault, R. J., unpublished research.Google Scholar
27. Seol, K., unpublished research.Google Scholar
28. Majumdar, S. and Krawitz, A. D., J. Matls. Sci. and Engrg., in press.Google Scholar