Hostname: page-component-669899f699-vbsjw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-27T12:38:53.884Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Remote Measurements of Actinide Species in Aqueous Solutions Using an Optical Fiber Photoacoustic Spectrometer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

Richard E. Russo ,
Piotr B. Robouch  and
Robert J. Silva
Richard E. Russo
Affiliation:
Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Applied Science Division, MS 90–2024, Berkeley, CA 94720
Piotr B. Robouch
Affiliation:
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Nuclear Chemistry Division, L–396, Livermore, CA 94550
Robert J. Silva
Affiliation:
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Nuclear Chemistry Division, L–396, Livermore, CA 94550
Get access

Abstract

A photoacoustic spectrometer, equipped with an 85 meter optical fiber, was used to perform absorption measurements of lanthanide and actinide samples, located in a glovebox. The spectrometer was tested using aqueous solutions of praseodymium and americium ions; the sensitivity for remote measurements was found to be similar to that achieved in the laboratory without the fiber.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 212: Symposium P – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XIV , 1990 , 539
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

1. Tarn, A.C., Rev. Mod. Phys. 58, 381 (1986).Google Scholar
2. McClelland, J.F., Anal. Chem. 55, 89A (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. West, G.A, Barrett, J.J., Siebert, D.R. and Reddy, K.V., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 54, 797 (1983).Google Scholar
4. Patel, C.K.N. and Tarn, A C., Rev. Mod. Phys. 53, 517 (1981).Google Scholar
5. Stumpe, R., Kim, J.I., Schrepp, W. and Walter, H., Appl. Phys. B 34, 203 (1984).Google Scholar
6. Schrepp, W., Stumpe, R., Kim, J.I. and Walther, H., Appl. Phys. B 32, 207 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Beitz, J.V., Bowers, D.L., Doxtader, M.M., Maroni, V.A, and Reed, D.T., Radiochim. Acta 44/45. 87 (1988).Google Scholar
8. Beitz, J.V., Doxtader, M.M., Maroni, V.A., Okajima, S., and Reed, D.T., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 61, 1395 (1990).Google Scholar
9. Torres, R.A, Palmer, C.E.A, Baisden, P.A, Russo, R.E. and Silva, R.J., Anal. Chem. 62, 298 (1990).Google Scholar
10. Tam, A C. and Patel, C.K.N., Appl. Opts. 18, 3348 (1979).Google Scholar
11. Klenze, R. and Kim, J.I., Radiochim. Acta 44/45. 77 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Berthoud, T., Decambox, P., Kirsch, B., Mauchien, P., and Moulin, C., Anal. Chem. 62, 1296 (1988).Google Scholar
13. Bidoglio, G., Tanet, G., Cavalli, P., and Omenetto, N., Inorg. Chim. Acta 140, 293 (1987).Google Scholar
14. Omenetto, N., Cavalli, P., Rossi, G., Bidoglio, G., and Turk, G.C., J. Anal. Atom. Spectrosc. 2, 579 (1987).Google Scholar
15. Cauchetier, Ph. and Guichard, C., in “Americium and Curium Chemistry and Technology” (Edelstein, N.M.; Navratil, J,D.; Schulz, W.W. Eds.) (1985).Google Scholar