Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:36:30.566Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Relevance of Acoustical Methods in Estimating Cavity-Induced Mural Degradation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Sandra Cruz-Flores ,
Miguel De Icaza  and
Victor M. Castano
Sandra Cruz-Flores
Affiliation:
Coordinación Nacional de Restauración, INAH/CNCA, México, D.F., 04120
Miguel De Icaza
Affiliation:
IFUNAM, México, D.F., 01000
Victor M. Castano
Affiliation:
IFUNAM, México, D.F., 01000
Get access

Abstract

Acoustic techniques have always had an important presence in monument conservation. A first evaluation of the formation of cavities and/or inhomogeneities is commonly done by finger rapping and ear listening, to discover acoustical variations in the transmission of sound waves. We have characterized the size of the cavities in several materials, as stones, rocks, mural paintings and stucco, by using 7 kHz sound waves generated by a piezoelectric transducer. The experimental set-up developed for these purposes allows, through the analysis of the waves' delay times, to detect cavities and/or inhomogeneities as small as 4 cm in diameter. The design of the instrument, its capabilities and potential applications are documented.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 352: Symposium – Materials Issues in Art and Archaeology IV , 1995 , 907
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] D'Ossat, G. de Angelis. Guide to the methodical study of monuments and causes of their deterioration. (ICROOM. Faculty of Architecture, University of Rome, Italy. 1982.)Google Scholar
[2] Mora, P., Mora, L. and Philippot, P.. Conservation of wall paintings. (Butterworths, Scotland. 1984.)Google Scholar
[3] Smith, R.L.. Ultrasonic materials characterization. NDT International 20, 42 (1987).Google Scholar
[4] Nair, S.M., Hsu, D.K. and Rose, J.H.. Prog. in Quant. Nondest. Eval. 6B, 1165 (1987).Google Scholar
[5] Simpson, W.A. and Clung, R.W. Mc. Materials evaluation. March, 391 (1993).Google Scholar
[6] Cruz-Flores, S., Icaza, M. de and Castañio, V.M.. Submitted to Materials Evaluation (1994).Google Scholar
[7] Cruz-Flores, S.. Thesis. ENCRM, INAH-SEP, México, 1993.Google Scholar