Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:47:50.624Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Relationship Between Molecular Structure and Spectroscopic Properties of a Series of Transition Metal-Containing Phenylacetylene Oligomers and Polymers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

Thomas M. Cooper
Affiliation:
Materials and Manufacturing Directorate, Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson, Air Force Base, OH 45433, USA
Daniel G McLean
Affiliation:
Science Applications International Corporation, Dayton, OH 45434, USA
Joy E. Rogers
Affiliation:
Technical Management Concepts International, Dayton, OH 45433, USA
Get access

Abstract

To develop novel nonlinear dyes for photonic applications, we synthesized a series of transition metal-containing phenylacetylene oligomers and polymers. The optical properties of these compounds were measured by UV/Vis, fluorescence, and flash photolysis experiments. As the number of oligomer units increased, the transition energies decreased. A solvatochromism experiment suggested the fluorescing state was different from the absorbing state. As a group, the spectra of the polymeric versions of these complexes were red shifted from the spectra of the oligomers. The polymeric complexes had less clear trends relating the number of oligomer units to transition energies. A comparison of a low molecular weight and a high molecular weight polymer showed the degree of polymerization caused spectroscopic shifts comparable to the number of phenylacetylene units in the monomer unit.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Nguyen, P. and Gomez-Elipe, P., Manners, I., Chem. Rev. 99, 1515, (1999).Google Scholar
2. Yam, V. W.-W., Lo, K. K.-W. and Wong, K. M.-C., J. Organomet. Chem. 578, 3, (1999).Google Scholar
3. Stang, P. J. and Olenyuk, B., Acc. Chem. Res. 30, 502, (1997).Google Scholar
4. Porter, P. L., Guha, S., Kang, K. and Frazier, C. C., Polymer 32, 1756, (1991).Google Scholar
5. Staromlynska, J., McKay, T. J., Bolger, J. A. and Davy, J. R., J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 15, 1731, (1998).Google Scholar
6. McKay, T. J., Bolger, J. A., Staromlynska, J. and Davy, J. R., J. Chem. Phys. 108, 5537, (1998).Google Scholar
7. McKay, T. J., Staromlynska, J., Davy, J., and, R. Bolger, J. A., J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 18, 358, (2001).Google Scholar
8. Wilson, J. S., Kohler, A., Friend, R.H., Al-Suti, M.K., Al-Mandhary, M.R.A., Khan, M.S. and Raithby, P.R., J. Chem. Phys. 113, 7627, (2000).Google Scholar
9. Sonogashira, K., Fujikura, Y., Yatake, T., Toyoshima, N., Takahashi, S. and Higihara, N., J. Organomet. Chem. 145, 101, (1978).Google Scholar
10. Takahashi, S., Kariya, M., Yatake, T., Sonogashira, K. andGoogle Scholar
11. Hagihara, N., Macromolecules 11, 1063, (1978).Google Scholar
11. Demas, J. N., Crosby, G. A., J. Phys. Chem. 75, 991, (1971).Google Scholar
12. Beljonne, D. et al. , J. Chem. Phys. 105, 3868, (1996).Google Scholar
13. Turro, N. J., Modern Molecular Photochemistry (University Science Books, Sausalito, 1991).Google Scholar
14. Cooper, T. M., Natarajan, L. V., Sowards, L. A., Spangler, C. W., Chem. Phys. Lett. 310, 508, (1999).Google Scholar
15. Kohler, A. et al. , Nature 392, 903, (1998).Google Scholar