Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T01:59:17.313Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reflectance-Difference Spectroscopy: a New Real-Time, In-Situ Analysis of MBE and OMCVD Growth Surfaces.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

E. Colas
Affiliation:
Bellcore, Red Bank, NJ 07701-7040
D.E. Aspnes
Affiliation:
Bellcore, Red Bank, NJ 07701-7040
R. Bhat
Affiliation:
Bellcore, Red Bank, NJ 07701-7040
A.A. Studna
Affiliation:
Bellcore, Red Bank, NJ 07701-7040
M.A. Koza
Affiliation:
Bellcore, Red Bank, NJ 07701-7040
V.G. Keramidas
Affiliation:
Bellcore, Red Bank, NJ 07701-7040
Get access

Abstract

Reflectance-difference spectroscopy (RDS) is a recently developed optical technique that allows to monitor chemical and structural changes at a growing semiconductor surface, in-situ and in real-time. This technique was applied recently to organometallic chemical vapor deposition (OMCVD) on a [100] GaAs growth surface. The results show that submonolayer coverage of reacted species can be followed by this technique, which provided unique insights into the microscopic growth mechanisms. The time, temperature and pressure dependences of surface coverage show that OMCVD growth is controlled by two basic processes with distinct activation energies, i.e. reversible chemisorption (at -26 kcal/mole), and decomposition (at 39 kcal/mole) of trimethylgallium (TMG) at surface lattice sites. The importance of reversible chemisorption, which is of an excluded-volume type, due to the large size of the TMG molecule, had been overlooked until now in the literature, where only one activation energy was used to describe growth kinetics.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Neave, J.H., Noyce, B.A., Dobson, P.J., and Norton, N., Appl. Phys. A 31, 1 (1983)Google Scholar
2. Butler, J.E., Bottka, N., Sillmon, R.S. and Gaskill, D.K., J. Crystal Growth 77, 163, (1983)Google Scholar
3. Monteil, Y., Berthet, M.P., Favre, R., Hariss, A., Bouix, J., Vaille, M., and Gobart, P., J. Cryst. Growth 77, 172, (1986)Google Scholar
4. Lee, P.W., Omstead, P.R., McKenna, D.R., and Jensen, K.F., J. Cryst. Growth 85, 165, (1987)Google Scholar
5. Hottier, F. and Theeten, J.B., J. Cryst. Growth 48, 644, (1980)Google Scholar
6. Hottier, F. and Cadoret, R., J. Cryst. Growth 56, 304, (1982)Google Scholar
7. Colas, E., Aspnes, D.E., Bhat, R., Studna, A.A., Koza, M.A., and Keramidas, V.G., accepted in J. Cryst. Growth.Google Scholar
8. Aspnes, D.E., Harbison, J.P., Studna, A.A., and Florez, L.T., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A6, 1327 (1988)Google Scholar
9. Aspnes, D.E., Harbison, J.P., Studna, A.A., and Florez, L.T., Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 1687, (1987).Google Scholar
10. Aspnes, D.E., Bhat, R., Colas, E., Florez, L.T., Harbison, J.P., Kelly, M.K., Keramidas, V.G., Koza, M.A., and Studna, A.A., Proc. of SPIE conference on Monitoring and Control of Plasma-Enhanced Processes in Semiconductors, in press (1988)Google Scholar
11. Reep, D.H. and Ghandhi, S.K., J. Electrochem. Soc. 130, 675, (1983)Google Scholar
12. Lee, P.W., Olmstead, T.R., McKenna, D.R., and Jensen, K.F., J. Cryst. Growth 85, 165 (1987)Google Scholar
13. Petzke, W.H., Gottschlach, V., and Butter, E., Krist. Tech. 9, 763, (1974)Google Scholar
14. Balk, P., Fischer, M., Grundmann, D., Luckerath, R., Luth, H., and Richter, W., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B5, 1453, (1987).Google Scholar
15. Doi, A., Iwai, S., Meguro, T., and Namba, S., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 27, 795 (1988)Google Scholar
16. DenBaars, S.P., Maa, B. Y., Dapkus, P. D., Danner, A.D., and Lee, H.C., J. Cryst. Growth 77, 188, (1986).Google Scholar