Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T20:24:28.667Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reduced Subboundary Misalignment in SOI Films Scanned at Low Velocities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

Loren Pfeiffer
Affiliation:
AT&T Bell Laboratories Murray Hill, New Jersey 07974
K. W. West
Affiliation:
AT&T Bell Laboratories Murray Hill, New Jersey 07974
D. C. Joy
Affiliation:
AT&T Bell Laboratories Murray Hill, New Jersey 07974
J. M. Gibson
Affiliation:
AT&T Bell Laboratories Murray Hill, New Jersey 07974
A. E. Gelman
Affiliation:
AT&T Bell Laboratories Murray Hill, New Jersey 07974
Get access

Abstract

Silicon-on-Insulator (SOI) films on SiO2 scan-melted at low velocities (20 to 300 µm/sec) with reduced thermal gradients at the melt-freezing interface are found to have qualitatively different properties from similar films melt-scanned at higher gradients and scan velocities. The transition between the two regimes appears to be abrupt. Scanning at intermediate velocities often results an admixture of patches containing one or the other type of material. The slow scan regime is characterized by long straight non-branched subboundaries having a lateral spacing 50-60 µm, and very small tilt misalignments of 0.1° or less. These slow scan subboundaries are found to consist largely of threading dislocations in contrast conventional subboundaries which are tilt boundaries of up to 3° and typically consist of edge dislocations running in the plane of the film.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Present address: Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass.

References

1.Pfeiffer, L., West, K. W., Paine, S. and Joy, D. C., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 35, 583592 (1985).Google Scholar
2.Pfeiffer, L., Celler, G. K., Kovacs, T., and Robinson, McD., Appl. Phys. Letts. 43, 10481050 (1983).Google Scholar
3.Similar apparatus is described in better detail in the paper by Fan, J. C. C., Tsaur, B-Y, Chapman, R. L., and Geis, M. W., Appl. Phys. Letts. 41, 186188 (1982).Google Scholar
4.Schimmel, D. G., J. Electrochem. Soc. 126, 479 (1979).Google Scholar
5.Joy, D. C., Newbury, D. E. and Davidson, D. L., J. Appl. Phys. 53, R81 (1982).Google Scholar
6.Because no subgrain is in this sample crystallographically misaligned by more than 0.1' this slow scan SOI material yields an ideal value of. 03 for the Rutherford Backscattering (RBS) channeling to random ratio using 2 MeV4 He. for further details and an RBS spectrum see Ref. 1.Google Scholar
7.Pinizzotto, R. F., J. Cryst. Growth 63, 559582 (1983).Google Scholar
8.Baumgart, H. and Phillipp, F., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 35, 593598 (1985).Google Scholar
9.Geis, M. W., Smith, H. I., Silversmith, D. J., R. W.Mountain and Thompson, C. V., J. Electrochem. Soc. 130, 1178 (1983).Google Scholar
10.Pfeiffer, L., Paine, S., Gilmer, G.H., Saarloos, W. van and West, K. W.; Phys. Rev. Letts. 54, 19441947 (1985).Google Scholar
11.The first report of scanned melting experiment showing the relationship between subboundary spacing and thermal gradient may be found in Ref. 9. In that work two upper heater wires were used to produce a shallower temperature gradient.Google Scholar
12.Geis, M. W., Smith, H. I., Tsaur, B-Y, Fan, J. C. C., Silversmith, D. J. and Mountain, R. W., J. Electrochem. Soc. 129, 2812 (1982).Google Scholar