Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:13:32.500Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Redox Behavior Below 1000K of Pt-Impregnated CeO2-ZrO2 Solid Solutions: An In-Situ Neutron Diffraction Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

C.-K. Loong
Affiliation:
Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL 60439, U. S. A.
S. M. Short
Affiliation:
Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL 60439, U. S. A.
M. Ozawa
Affiliation:
Nagoya Institute of Technology, Tajimi, Gifu, 507, Japan.
S. Suzuki
Affiliation:
Nagoya Institute of Technology, Tajimi, Gifu, 507, Japan.
Get access

Abstract

The Ce3+ ↔ Ce4+ redox process in automotive three-way catalysts such as Ce-ZrO2/Pt provides an essential mechanism to oxygen storage/release under dynamic air-to-fuel ratio cycling. Such a function requires a metal-support interaction which is not completely understood. We have carried out an in-situ neutron powder diffraction study to monitor the crystal structures (a mixture of a major tetragonal and a minor monoclinic phase) of 10mol% Ce-doped ZrO2 with and without Pt (1wt%) impregnation under oxidizing and reducing conditions over the temperature range of 25°-700°C. The samples were heated first in flowing 2%O2/Ar from room temperature to 400°C and then in 1%CO/Ar to about 700°C. A discontinued increase of the tetragonal unit-cell volume, a decrease of tetragonality (c/a), and a change of color from light yellow to gray when changing from oxidizing to reducing atmosphere were observed only in the sample containing Pt. This result supports the model which assumes the formation of oxygen vacancies initially near the Pt atoms. As more Ce ions are reduced from 4+ to 3+ oxidation states at high temperatures, oxygen vacancies migrate to the bulk of the oxide particles.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Hamson, B., Diwell, A. F., and Hallett, C., Platinum Metals Rev. 32, 73 (1988).Google Scholar
2. Loong, C.-K., Thiyagarajan, P., Richardson, J., J. W., , Ozawa, M., and Suzuki, S., J. Catal. 171, 498(1997).Google Scholar
3. Loong, C.-K., Richardson, J. W. Jr, and Ozawa, M., J. Catal. 157, 636 (1995).Google Scholar
4. Trovarelli, A., Catal. Rev. - Sci. Eng. 38, 439 (1996).10.1080/01614949608006464Google Scholar
5. Badri, A., Lamotte, J., Lavalley, J. C., Laachir, A., Perrichom, V., Touret, O., Sauvion, G. N., and Quemere, E., Eur. J. Solid State Inorg. Chem. 28, 445 (1991).Google Scholar
6. Ozawa, M., Kimura, M., and Isogai, A., J. Alloys Compounds 193, 73 (1993).Google Scholar
7. Larson, A. C. and von Dreele, R. B., (Los Alamos National Laboratory, 1985) Report LAUR 86–748.Google Scholar
8. Ozawa, M. and Kimura, M., J. Less-Common Metals 171, 195 (1991).10.1016/0022-5088(91)90143-RGoogle Scholar
9. Sheu, T.-S., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 76, 1772 (1993).10.1111/j.1151-2916.1993.tb06646.xGoogle Scholar
10. Soria, J. and Moya, J. S., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 74, 1747 (1991).Google Scholar
11. Rice, R. W., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 74, 1746 (1991).10.1111/j.1151-2916.1991.tb07178.xGoogle Scholar
12. Moya, J. S., Moreno, R., Requena, J., and Soria, J., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 71, C479 (1988).Google Scholar