Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T06:17:47.963Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reactivity of Fly Ash At High pH

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

Hans S. Pietersen ,
Alex L. A. Fraay  and
Jan M. Bijen
Hans S. Pietersen
Affiliation:
Faculty of Civil Engineering, Materials Science Section, Delft Technical University, 2628 CN Delft, The Netherlands.
Alex L. A. Fraay
Affiliation:
Faculty of Civil Engineering, Materials Science Section, Delft Technical University, 2628 CN Delft, The Netherlands.
Jan M. Bijen
Affiliation:
Faculty of Civil Engineering, Materials Science Section, Delft Technical University, 2628 CN Delft, The Netherlands.
Get access

Abstract

The reactivity of fly ash in cementituous systems has been an object of many studies, and is only understood in broad terms. It is generally agreed that the particle size distribution of fly ash correlates with strength development. It has also been demonstrated that temperature and pH development of the blended cement paste have an effect on fly ash reactivity. It is however not clear whether ash chemistry and/or ash glass structure have an influence on its reactivity, as is the case with some blast furnace slag cements. In order to discriminate between the many variables controlling fly ash reactivity, the dissolution kinetics of class-F fly ash have been studied. The fly ash was first separated into equal size and density fractions. These were reacted with NaOH, with a pH ranging from 13.0 to 13.7 and temperatures between 20 and 40°C. If the results of the dissolution experiments are corrected for differences in glass content and particle size, the effects of temperature and pH seem to be of more importance than differences in ash chemistry. The dissolution proceeded virtually congruent. TEM micrographs of some of the ash fractions indicate that a wide variety of glasses may be encountered in fly ashes; most glasses show evidence of phase separation. The results are discussed with respect to glass structure and glass dissolution-theory.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 178: Symposium W – Fly Ash and Coal Conversion By-Products VI , 1989 , 139
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Fraay, A.L.A., Bijen, J.M.J.M. and de Haan, Y.M., Cem. Concr. Res., 19, 235 (1989).Google Scholar
2. Bakker, R.F.M. in Proc. 1st Int. Conf. on the Use of Fly Ash. Silica Fume. Slag & Other Mineral By-Products in Concrete, Montebello, 1983 (ACI SP 79, 1983), 1., pp. 589–605.Google Scholar
3. Fraay, A.L.A., Fly ash as a pozzolan in concrete (PhD-thesis), Delft Technical University, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Materials Science Department (1990).Google Scholar
4. Hemmings, R.T. and Berry, E.E. in Fly Ash and Coal Conversion By-Product: Characterization. Utilization and Disposal, edited by McCarthy, G.J., Glasser, F.P., Roy, D.M. and Hemmings, R.T. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 113, Pittsburgh, PA 1988) pp. 3–38.Google Scholar
5. Glasser, F.P. (private communication, 9–89).Google Scholar
6. Pietersen, H.S., Stevinrapport 25.1–89–20, Delft University of Technology.Google Scholar
7. Hubbard, F.H., Dhir, R.K. and Ellis, M.S., Cem. Concr. Res. 15, 185–198 (1985).Google Scholar
8. Tang, M.-S., Xu, Z.-Z. and Han, S.-F., Durability of building materials, 4, 377–385 (1987).Google Scholar
9. Paul, A., Chemistry of glasses, Chapman and Hall, London, 293pp. (1982).Google Scholar
10. Vogel, W., Chemistry of Glasses, edited by Kreidl, N. (The American Ceramic Society, Inc., Columbus, Ohio, 1985).Google Scholar
11. Smolczyk, H.G. in Proceedings of the 7th Int. Congress on the Chem. of Cement 1, III–1/3, Paris (1980), pp. III–1/3-III-1/15.Google Scholar
12. V.I. Satarin in Proceedings of the 6th Int. Congress on the Chem. of Cement, 1, Moscow (1974).Google Scholar
13. ENCI Research (ENCI, Maastricht, The Netherlands) nr. 19/77,1977, pp. 1–24.Google Scholar
14. MacDowell, J.F. and Beall, G.H., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 52, 17 (1969).Google Scholar
15. Qian, J.C., Lachowski, E.E. and Glasser, F.P. in Fly Ash and Coal Conversion By-Products: Characterization. Utilization and Disposal, edited by McCarthy, G.J., Glasser, F.P., Roy, D.M. and Hemmings, R.T. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 113, Pittsburgh, PA 1988) pp. 45–53.Google Scholar
16. Qian, J.C., Lachowski, E.E. and Glasser, F.P. in Fly Ash and Coal Conversion By-Products: Characterization. Utilization and Disposal, edited by Hemmings, R.T., Berry, E.E., Mc-Carthy, G.J. and Glasser, F.P. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 136, Pittsburgh, PA 1989) pp. 77–85.Google Scholar
17. Doremus, R.H. in Treatise in Materials Science and Technolog, 17, Class II, edited by Tomozawa, M. and Doremus, R.H. (Academic Press, USA, 1979).Google Scholar
18. Bunker, B.C. in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management X, edited (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 84, Pittsburgh, PA 1987) pp. 493–507.Google Scholar
19. Lasaga, A.C. in Kinetics of Geochemical Processes, 8, edited by Lasaga, A.C. and Kirkpatrick, R.J. (Reviews in Mineralogy, Mineralogical Society of America, 1981) pp. 1–68.Google Scholar
20. Roy, D.M., Luke, K. and Glasser, F.P. in Fly Ash and Coal Conversion By- Products: Characterization, Utilization and Disposal, edited by McCarthy, G.J. and Lauf, R.J. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 43, Pittsburgh, PA 1985) pp. 3–20.Google Scholar
21. Andrade, A., Coenegracht, Y.M.A., Hollman, G.G., Pietersen, H.S. and Schuiling, R.D. (this volume).Google Scholar
22. Pietersen, H.S., Stevin rapport 25.1–89–19, Delft University Technology.Google Scholar
23. Larbi, J.A. and J.M. Bijen (this volume)Google Scholar
24. Dudas, M.J. and Warren, C.J., Geoderma 40, 101 (1987)Google Scholar
25. Pietersen, H.S., Vriend, S.P., Poorter, R.E.P. and J.M.J.M. Bijen (this volume).Google Scholar
26. Busch, H. and Petzold, A., Silikattechnik 20, Heft 2,47–49 (1969).Google Scholar
27. Busch, H. and Petzold, A, Silikattechnik 22, Heft 1, 13–14 (1971).Google Scholar