Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T04:20:45.868Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

RE dependence of superconductivity in parent T’-RE2CuO4 – implication on the nature of superconductivity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 July 2012

Michio Naito
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Physics, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Koganei, Tokyo 184-8588, Japan
Ai Ikeda
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Physics, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Koganei, Tokyo 184-8588, Japan
Hideki Yamamoto
Affiliation:
Department of Material Science, NTT Basic Research Laboratories, Atsugi, Kanagawa 243-0198, Japan
Takaaki Manabe
Affiliation:
National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8565, Japan
Get access

Abstract

We present the results of our systematic investigation of the RE dependency of superconductivity in the parent compounds T’-RE2CuO4 (RE = Pr, Nd, Sm, Eu, Gd, and Tb). Superconducting samples were prepared by metal organic decomposition (MOD). A stringent control of synthesis- and post-annealing-conditions is required to obtain superconducting samples. Superconductivity with a transition temperature (Tconset) ≥ 30 K is achieved for RE = Pr and Nd. By contrast, Tconset is at highest 20 K for RE = Gd. Our results indicate that the induction of superconductivity into T’-RE2CuO4 cuprates strongly depends on the RE3+ ionic size. This trend is discussed from the viewpoint of RE-dependent thermodynamic stability of T’-RE2CuO4. For smaller RE3+ ions, the thermodynamic boundary conditions become tighter.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Matsumoto, O., Utsuki, A., Tsukada, A., Yamamoto, H., Manabe, T., and Naito, M., Physica C 468 (2008) 1148.Google Scholar
2. Matsumoto, O., Utsuki, A.. Tsukada, A., Yamamoto, H., Manabe, T., and Naito, M., Phys. Rev. B 79 (2009) 100508.Google Scholar
3. Matsumoto, O., Utsuki, A., Tsukada, A., Yamamoto, H., Manabe, T., and Naito, M., Physica C 469 (2009) 924.Google Scholar
4. Matsumoto, O., Utsuki, A., Tsukada, A., Yamamoto, H., Manabe, T., and Naito, M., Physica C 469 (2009) 940.Google Scholar
5. Uzumaki, T., Hashimoto, K., and Kamehara, N., Physica C 202 (1992) 175.Google Scholar
6. Tretyakov, Yu. D., Kaul, A. R., and Makukhin, N. V., J. Solid State Chem. 17 (1976) 183.Google Scholar
7. Petrov, A. N., Zuyev, A. Yu., and Cherepanov, V. A., Russian J. Phys. Chem. 62 (1988) 1613 Google Scholar
8. Petrov, A. N., Cherepanov, V. A., Zuyev, A. Yu., and Zhukovsky, V. M., J. Solid State Chem. 77 (1988) 1 Google Scholar
9. Idemoto, Y., Oyagi, I., and Fueki, K., Physica C 195 (1992) 269 Google Scholar
10. Zhu, Y. T. and Manthiram, A., Physica C 224 (1994) 256 Google Scholar
11. Zhu, Y. T. and Manthiram, A., J. Solid State Chem. 114 (1995) 491 Google Scholar